Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests: Test the new RISC-V hwprobe interface

Mark Brown
2023-02-06T21:27:45Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 570 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:14:55PM -0800, Evan Green wrote:

> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S

> +.global _start
> +_start:
> +.option push
> +.option norelax
> + la gp, __global_pointer$
> +.option pop
> +
> + la sp, stack
> +
> + la t0, heap
> + la t1, brk
> + REG_S t0, 0(t1)
> +
> + li a0, 0
> + li a1, 0
> +
> + call main

This looks like it's just a standard program entry but I don't speak
RISC-V asm so I might be missing something. If that's the case might it
make sense to use nolibc here?

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]