public inbox for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: <conor@kernel.org>, <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>,
	"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] RISC-V: add non-alternative fallback for riscv_has_extension_[un]likely()
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:05:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230324100538.3514663-2-conor.dooley@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230324100538.3514663-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com>

The has_fpu() check, which in turn calls riscv_has_extension_likely(),
relies on alternatives to figure out whether the system has an FPU.
As a result, it will malfunction on XIP kernels, as they do not support
the alternatives mechanism.

When alternatives support is not present, fall back to using
__riscv_isa_extension_available() in riscv_has_extension_[un]likely()
instead stead, which handily takes the same argument, so that kernels
that do not support alternatives can accurately report the presence of
FPU support.

Fixes: 702e64550b12 ("riscv: fpu: switch has_fpu() to riscv_has_extension_likely()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ad445951-3d13-4644-94d9-e0989cda39c3@spud/
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
index e3021b2590de..6263a0de1c6a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
@@ -57,18 +57,31 @@ struct riscv_isa_ext_data {
 	unsigned int isa_ext_id;
 };
 
+unsigned long riscv_isa_extension_base(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap);
+
+#define riscv_isa_extension_mask(ext) BIT_MASK(RISCV_ISA_EXT_##ext)
+
+bool __riscv_isa_extension_available(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap, int bit);
+#define riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, ext)	\
+	__riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, RISCV_ISA_EXT_##ext)
+
 static __always_inline bool
 riscv_has_extension_likely(const unsigned long ext)
 {
 	compiletime_assert(ext < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX,
 			   "ext must be < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX");
 
-	asm_volatile_goto(
-	ALTERNATIVE("j	%l[l_no]", "nop", 0, %[ext], 1)
-	:
-	: [ext] "i" (ext)
-	:
-	: l_no);
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
+		asm_volatile_goto(
+		ALTERNATIVE("j	%l[l_no]", "nop", 0, %[ext], 1)
+		:
+		: [ext] "i" (ext)
+		:
+		: l_no);
+	} else {
+		if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ext))
+			goto l_no;
+	}
 
 	return true;
 l_no:
@@ -81,26 +94,23 @@ riscv_has_extension_unlikely(const unsigned long ext)
 	compiletime_assert(ext < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX,
 			   "ext must be < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX");
 
-	asm_volatile_goto(
-	ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j	%l[l_yes]", 0, %[ext], 1)
-	:
-	: [ext] "i" (ext)
-	:
-	: l_yes);
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
+		asm_volatile_goto(
+		ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j	%l[l_yes]", 0, %[ext], 1)
+		:
+		: [ext] "i" (ext)
+		:
+		: l_yes);
+	} else {
+		if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ext))
+			goto l_yes;
+	}
 
 	return false;
 l_yes:
 	return true;
 }
 
-unsigned long riscv_isa_extension_base(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap);
-
-#define riscv_isa_extension_mask(ext) BIT_MASK(RISCV_ISA_EXT_##ext)
-
-bool __riscv_isa_extension_available(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap, int bit);
-#define riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, ext)	\
-	__riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, RISCV_ISA_EXT_##ext)
-
 #endif
 
 #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_HWCAP_H */
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-24 10:05 [PATCH v1 0/2] RISC-V: Fixes for riscv_has_extension[un]likely()'s alternative dependency Conor Dooley
2023-03-24 10:05 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-03-24 10:05 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] RISC-V: always select RISCV_ALTERNATIVE for non-xip kernels Conor Dooley
2023-03-24 11:31 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] RISC-V: Fixes for riscv_has_extension[un]likely()'s alternative dependency Andrew Jones
2023-03-24 11:37   ` Conor Dooley
2023-03-24 11:43     ` Andrew Jones
2023-03-24 13:20 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2023-03-30 21:02 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-03-30 21:10 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230324100538.3514663-2-conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox