From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86520EB64D9 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 05:58:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=m9wWx8RnFNxbbmTlJ3QXRafNmdfYk3S7fUFxWNYpje4=; b=xd/6mZqafXmeSz aW5apmG6spF0iIK7KmU0oVGHnIF8jIh3Zjdzsb4SzNNrzr0qwMlnA5UID5/29wBKmZ1YVK1x+cN5e kA8kYj1IgcdqLGaN5781EjkycpzoQe9wOAjeoddUcpcwF6eH55S2szAV8FNrCAUnf2oPJDJD06K+j gZdgvq8/lv+xvrLm/dKufrO5dpizeYGmNavpxgWJogjKwnc83Bt3cYe3NEY7hrIiGOMmnWLC7nKYG bMHz1cKVaGeoM3yA8YowpVczCgGL5Q5/APUK/WaKrgb2AqySBh82QdPZniaFjSnkfhgWa3ls5ECsw aorHcyriaDKt6GLr9/Pw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qAOxA-002pSc-0V; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 05:58:28 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qAOx5-002pPz-28; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 05:58:26 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E2760D2D; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 05:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA841C433C8; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 05:58:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1686981501; bh=9SqjLlF2xzEFMDzeUI2FvZ8TQ/VYLeU5U3+d2ag6lCs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=B9hc07/UYnnRas23n9bJwWr+pH130gxwd28u02GqPOK/3pfJBCaemAnqVGrkDZJvc c1CAOIsikGJgqoHvH/7lYMCMhV6ZKfKOSUTWgFsy65h+ShXGvPeLAwohq+3h4qZEdI 4hdYWdRJ1+jHavy8l0eCEiP9dZuoxTKyc1UOJ6v+W6Yd8E12mVMWzVMrv38nPKgPzX moqJqCymmH/VJkuy+GUQ7PHhVA13ypUE+mj0CzOEMjMShVb3ccT9eDbLaWG8SQqxxA PHzQL4oLwI3nEQGSA+tdAQmm6prwylQLhbSagwZslqD3uTtetH44zVkHm5GQY4CCKg LaEhwb1fWA+nA== Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 08:57:35 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , "David S. Miller" , Dinh Nguyen , Heiko Carstens , Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Luis Chamberlain , Mark Rutland , Michael Ellerman , Nadav Amit , "Naveen N. Rao" , Palmer Dabbelt , Puranjay Mohan , Rick Edgecombe , Russell King , Song Liu , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: introduce execmem_text_alloc() and jit_text_alloc() Message-ID: <20230617055735.GN52412@kernel.org> References: <20230616085038.4121892-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20230616085038.4121892-3-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230616_225823_775041_A468378A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.24 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:48:02PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:50:28AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > > > module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code. > > > > Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems > > that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules > > and puts the burden of code allocation to the modules code. > > > > Several architectures override module_alloc() because of various > > constraints where the executable memory can be located and this causes > > additional obstacles for improvements of code allocation. > > > > Start splitting code allocation from modules by introducing > > execmem_text_alloc(), execmem_free(), jit_text_alloc(), jit_free() APIs. > > > > Initially, execmem_text_alloc() and jit_text_alloc() are wrappers for > > module_alloc() and execmem_free() and jit_free() are replacements of > > module_memfree() to allow updating all call sites to use the new APIs. > > > > The intention semantics for new allocation APIs: > > > > * execmem_text_alloc() should be used to allocate memory that must reside > > close to the kernel image, like loadable kernel modules and generated > > code that is restricted by relative addressing. > > > > * jit_text_alloc() should be used to allocate memory for generated code > > when there are no restrictions for the code placement. For > > architectures that require that any code is within certain distance > > from the kernel image, jit_text_alloc() will be essentially aliased to > > execmem_text_alloc(). > > > > The names execmem_text_alloc() and jit_text_alloc() emphasize that the > > allocated memory is for executable code, the allocations of the > > associated data, like data sections of a module will use > > execmem_data_alloc() interface that will be added later. > > I like the API split - at the risk of further bikeshedding, perhaps > near_text_alloc() and far_text_alloc()? Would be more explicit. With near and far it should mention from where and that's getting too long. I don't mind changing the names, but I couldn't think about something better than Song's execmem and your jit. > Reviewed-by: Kent Overstreet Thanks! -- Sincerely yours, Mike. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv