public inbox for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] riscv,mmio: Fix readX()-to-delay() ordering
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:33:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230711133348.151383-2-parri.andrea@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230711133348.151383-1-parri.andrea@gmail.com>

Section 2.1 of the Platform Specification [1] states:

  Unless otherwise specified by a given I/O device, I/O devices are on
  ordering channel 0 (i.e., they are point-to-point strongly ordered).

which is not sufficient to guarantee that a readX() by a hart completes
before a subsequent delay() on the same hart (cf. memory-barriers.txt,
"Kernel I/O barrier effects").

Set the I(nput) bit in __io_ar() to restore the ordering, align inline
comments.

[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-platform-specs

Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h
index aff6c33ab0c08..4c58ee7f95ecf 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h
@@ -101,9 +101,9 @@ static inline u64 __raw_readq(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
  * Relaxed I/O memory access primitives. These follow the Device memory
  * ordering rules but do not guarantee any ordering relative to Normal memory
  * accesses.  These are defined to order the indicated access (either a read or
- * write) with all other I/O memory accesses. Since the platform specification
- * defines that all I/O regions are strongly ordered on channel 2, no explicit
- * fences are required to enforce this ordering.
+ * write) with all other I/O memory accesses to the same peripheral. Since the
+ * platform specification defines that all I/O regions are strongly ordered on
+ * channel 0, no explicit fences are required to enforce this ordering.
  */
 /* FIXME: These are now the same as asm-generic */
 #define __io_rbr()		do {} while (0)
@@ -125,14 +125,14 @@ static inline u64 __raw_readq(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
 #endif
 
 /*
- * I/O memory access primitives. Reads are ordered relative to any
- * following Normal memory access. Writes are ordered relative to any prior
- * Normal memory access.  The memory barriers here are necessary as RISC-V
+ * I/O memory access primitives.  Reads are ordered relative to any following
+ * Normal memory read and delay() loop.  Writes are ordered relative to any
+ * prior Normal memory write.  The memory barriers here are necessary as RISC-V
  * doesn't define any ordering between the memory space and the I/O space.
  */
 #define __io_br()	do {} while (0)
-#define __io_ar(v)	__asm__ __volatile__ ("fence i,r" : : : "memory")
-#define __io_bw()	__asm__ __volatile__ ("fence w,o" : : : "memory")
+#define __io_ar(v)	({ __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence i,ir" : : : "memory"); })
+#define __io_bw()	({ __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence w,o" : : : "memory"); })
 #define __io_aw()	mmiowb_set_pending()
 
 #define readb(c)	({ u8  __v; __io_br(); __v = readb_cpu(c); __io_ar(__v); __v; })
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-11 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-11 13:33 [PATCH 0/2] riscv,mmio: I/O barriers fixes and cleanups Andrea Parri
2023-07-11 13:33 ` Andrea Parri [this message]
2023-07-11 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] riscv,mmio: Use the generic implementation for the I/O accesses Andrea Parri
2023-07-12  7:05   ` Conor Dooley
2023-07-12 15:18     ` Andrea Parri
2023-08-09 14:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] riscv,mmio: I/O barriers fixes and cleanups patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230711133348.151383-2-parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --to=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox