[PATCH v2] RISC-V: Don't trust V from the riscv,isa DT property on T-Head CPUs

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>

The last merge window contained both V support and the deprecation of
the riscv,isa DT property, with the V implementation reading riscv,isa
to determine the presence of the V extension.  At the time that was the
only way to do it, but there's a lot of ambiguity around V in ISA
strings.  In particular, there is a lot of firmware in the wild that
uses "v" in the riscv,isa DT property to communicate support for the
0.7.1 version of the Vector specification implemented by T-Head CPU
cores.

Rather than forcing use of the newly added interface that has strict
meanings for extensions to detect the presence of vector support, as
that would penalise those who have behaved, only ignore v in riscv,isa
on CPUs that report T-Head's vendor ID.

Fixes: dc6667a4e7e3 ("riscv: Extending cpufeature.c to detect V-extension")
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Co-developed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Use my version of the patch that touches hwcap and isainfo uniformly
- Don't penalise those who behaved
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index bdcf460ea53d..05362715e1b7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <asm/hwcap.h>
 #include <asm/patch.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <asm/sbi.h>
 #include <asm/vector.h>
 
 #define NUM_ALPHA_EXTS ('z' - 'a' + 1)
@@ -334,6 +335,27 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
 			set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM, isainfo->isa);
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * "V" in ISA strings is ambiguous in practice: it should mean
+		 * just the standard V-1.0 but vendors aren't well behaved.
+		 * Many vendors with T-Head CPU cores which implement the 0.7.1
+		 * version of the vector specification put "v" into their DTs
+		 * and no T-Head CPU cores with the standard version of vector
+		 * are in circulation yet.
+		 * Platforms with T-Head CPU cores that support the standard
+		 * version of vector must provide the explicit V property,
+		 * which is well defined.
+		 */
+		if (acpi_disabled && riscv_cached_mvendorid(cpu) == THEAD_VENDOR_ID) {
+			if (of_property_match_string(node, "riscv,isa-extensions", "v") >= 0) {
+				this_hwcap |= isa2hwcap[RISCV_ISA_EXT_v];
+				set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_v, isainfo->isa);
+			} else {
+				this_hwcap &= ~isa2hwcap[RISCV_ISA_EXT_v];
+				clear_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_v, isainfo->isa);
+			}
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * All "okay" hart should have same isa. Set HWCAP based on
 		 * common capabilities of every "okay" hart, in case they don't
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv