From: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
To: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, ardb@kernel.org
Cc: anup@brainfault.org, haicheng.li@intel.com,
ajones@ventanamicro.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: Rearrange hwcap.h and cpufeature.h
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:46:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230920074653.2509631-2-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920074653.2509631-1-xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Now hwcap.h and cpufeature.h are mutually including each other, and most of
the variable/API declarations in hwcap.h are implemented in cpufeature.c,
so, it's better to move them into cpufeature.h and leave only macros for
ISA extension logical IDs in hwcap.h.
BTW, the riscv_isa_extension_mask macro is not used now, so this patch
removes it.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 91 -----------------------------
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h | 2 +-
arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 13b7d35648a9..3061d33abc2f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -7,7 +7,10 @@
#define _ASM_CPUFEATURE_H
#include <linux/bitmap.h>
+#include <linux/jump_label.h>
#include <asm/hwcap.h>
+#include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
+#include <asm/errno.h>
/*
* These are probed via a device_initcall(), via either the SBI or directly
@@ -33,4 +36,84 @@ extern struct riscv_isainfo hart_isa[NR_CPUS];
void check_unaligned_access(int cpu);
void riscv_user_isa_enable(void);
+unsigned long riscv_get_elf_hwcap(void);
+
+struct riscv_isa_ext_data {
+ const unsigned int id;
+ const char *name;
+ const char *property;
+};
+
+extern const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[];
+extern const size_t riscv_isa_ext_count;
+extern bool riscv_isa_fallback;
+
+unsigned long riscv_isa_extension_base(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap);
+
+bool __riscv_isa_extension_available(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap, int bit);
+#define riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, ext) \
+ __riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, RISCV_ISA_EXT_##ext)
+
+static __always_inline bool
+riscv_has_extension_likely(const unsigned long ext)
+{
+ compiletime_assert(ext < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX,
+ "ext must be < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX");
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
+ asm_volatile_goto(
+ ALTERNATIVE("j %l[l_no]", "nop", 0, %[ext], 1)
+ :
+ : [ext] "i" (ext)
+ :
+ : l_no);
+ } else {
+ if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ext))
+ goto l_no;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+l_no:
+ return false;
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool
+riscv_has_extension_unlikely(const unsigned long ext)
+{
+ compiletime_assert(ext < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX,
+ "ext must be < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX");
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
+ asm_volatile_goto(
+ ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j %l[l_yes]", 0, %[ext], 1)
+ :
+ : [ext] "i" (ext)
+ :
+ : l_yes);
+ } else {
+ if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ext))
+ goto l_yes;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+l_yes:
+ return true;
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool riscv_cpu_has_extension_likely(int cpu, const unsigned long ext)
+{
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE) && riscv_has_extension_likely(ext))
+ return true;
+
+ return __riscv_isa_extension_available(hart_isa[cpu].isa, ext);
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(int cpu, const unsigned long ext)
+{
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE) && riscv_has_extension_unlikely(ext))
+ return true;
+
+ return __riscv_isa_extension_available(hart_isa[cpu].isa, ext);
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
index 31774bcdf1c6..141b7109c25c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
@@ -8,9 +8,6 @@
#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_HWCAP_H
#define _ASM_RISCV_HWCAP_H
-#include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
-#include <asm/errno.h>
-#include <linux/bits.h>
#include <uapi/asm/hwcap.h>
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_a ('a' - 'a')
@@ -67,92 +64,4 @@
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_SxAIA RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA
#endif
-#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-
-#include <linux/jump_label.h>
-#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
-
-unsigned long riscv_get_elf_hwcap(void);
-
-struct riscv_isa_ext_data {
- const unsigned int id;
- const char *name;
- const char *property;
-};
-
-extern const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[];
-extern const size_t riscv_isa_ext_count;
-extern bool riscv_isa_fallback;
-
-unsigned long riscv_isa_extension_base(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap);
-
-#define riscv_isa_extension_mask(ext) BIT_MASK(RISCV_ISA_EXT_##ext)
-
-bool __riscv_isa_extension_available(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap, int bit);
-#define riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, ext) \
- __riscv_isa_extension_available(isa_bitmap, RISCV_ISA_EXT_##ext)
-
-static __always_inline bool
-riscv_has_extension_likely(const unsigned long ext)
-{
- compiletime_assert(ext < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX,
- "ext must be < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX");
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
- asm_volatile_goto(
- ALTERNATIVE("j %l[l_no]", "nop", 0, %[ext], 1)
- :
- : [ext] "i" (ext)
- :
- : l_no);
- } else {
- if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ext))
- goto l_no;
- }
-
- return true;
-l_no:
- return false;
-}
-
-static __always_inline bool
-riscv_has_extension_unlikely(const unsigned long ext)
-{
- compiletime_assert(ext < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX,
- "ext must be < RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX");
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
- asm_volatile_goto(
- ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j %l[l_yes]", 0, %[ext], 1)
- :
- : [ext] "i" (ext)
- :
- : l_yes);
- } else {
- if (__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ext))
- goto l_yes;
- }
-
- return false;
-l_yes:
- return true;
-}
-
-static __always_inline bool riscv_cpu_has_extension_likely(int cpu, const unsigned long ext)
-{
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE) && riscv_has_extension_likely(ext))
- return true;
-
- return __riscv_isa_extension_available(hart_isa[cpu].isa, ext);
-}
-
-static __always_inline bool riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(int cpu, const unsigned long ext)
-{
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE) && riscv_has_extension_unlikely(ext))
- return true;
-
- return __riscv_isa_extension_available(hart_isa[cpu].isa, ext);
-}
-#endif
-
#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_HWCAP_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index b2ba3f79cfe9..e05b5dc1f0cb 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ static inline pte_t pud_pte(pud_t pud)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SVNAPOT
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
static __always_inline bool has_svnapot(void)
{
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h
index a727be723c56..f90d8e42f3c7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/jump_label.h>
#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
#include <asm/vector.h>
-#include <asm/hwcap.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/csr.h>
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
index c5ee07b3df07..87aaef656257 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
-#include <asm/hwcap.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/csr.h>
#include <asm/asm.h>
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-20 7:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] riscv: Optimize bitops with Zbb extension Xiao Wang
2023-09-20 7:46 ` Xiao Wang [this message]
2023-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: Rearrange hwcap.h and cpufeature.h Andrew Jones
2023-09-26 6:18 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-26 8:39 ` Wang, Xiao W
2023-09-20 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] riscv: Optimize bitops with Zbb extension Xiao Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230920074653.2509631-2-xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--to=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=haicheng.li@intel.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox