From: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
To: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
<palmer@dabbelt.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: <oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>, <anup@brainfault.org>,
<haicheng.li@intel.com>, <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: Rearrange hwcap.h and cpufeature.h
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:18:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309201921.GvBmYK5q-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920074653.2509631-2-xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Hi Xiao,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v6.6-rc2 next-20230920]
[cannot apply to efi/next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Xiao-Wang/riscv-Rearrange-hwcap-h-and-cpufeature-h/20230920-154024
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920074653.2509631-2-xiao.w.wang%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: Rearrange hwcap.h and cpufeature.h
config: riscv-rv32_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230920/202309201921.GvBmYK5q-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: riscv32-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230920/202309201921.GvBmYK5q-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202309201921.GvBmYK5q-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
fs/binfmt_elf.c: In function 'create_elf_tables':
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h:70:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_get_elf_hwcap'; did you mean 'riscv_fill_hwcap'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
70 | #define ELF_HWCAP riscv_get_elf_hwcap()
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/binfmt_elf.c:248:31: note: in definition of macro 'NEW_AUX_ENT'
248 | *elf_info++ = val; \
| ^~~
fs/binfmt_elf.c:260:31: note: in expansion of macro 'ELF_HWCAP'
260 | NEW_AUX_ENT(AT_HWCAP, ELF_HWCAP);
| ^~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
arch/riscv/kvm/main.c: In function 'riscv_kvm_init':
>> arch/riscv/kvm/main.c:73:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
73 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, h)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/riscv/kvm/main.c:73:50: error: 'h' undeclared (first use in this function)
73 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, h)) {
| ^
arch/riscv/kvm/main.c:73:50: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_local_hfence_gvma_vmid_gpa':
>> arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c:18:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_has_extension_unlikely' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
18 | #define has_svinval() riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/riscv/kvm/tlb.c:31:13: note: in expansion of macro 'has_svinval'
31 | if (has_svinval()) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_fp_reset':
>> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:22:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
22 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, f) ||
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:22:59: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
22 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, f) ||
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:22:59: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:23:59: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
23 | riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, d))
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_guest_fp_save':
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:39:56: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
39 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isa, d))
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:41:61: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
41 | else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isa, f))
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_guest_fp_restore':
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:51:56: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
51 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isa, d))
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:53:61: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
53 | else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(isa, f))
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_host_fp_save':
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:62:49: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
62 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, d))
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:64:54: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
64 | else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, f))
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_host_fp_restore':
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:70:49: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
70 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, d))
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:72:54: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
72 | else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, f))
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_get_reg_fp':
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:90:59: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
90 | riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, f)) {
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:101:66: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
101 | riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, d)) {
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_fp':
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:135:59: error: 'f' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
135 | riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, f)) {
| ^
| fd
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_fp.c:146:66: error: 'd' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fd'?
146 | riscv_isa_extension_available(vcpu->arch.isa, d)) {
| ^
| fd
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_timer.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_init':
>> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_timer.c:256:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
256 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSTC)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_timer.c:256:49: error: 'SSTC' undeclared (first use in this function)
256 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSTC)) {
| ^~~~
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_timer.c:256:49: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init':
>> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c:556:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
556 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c:556:50: error: 'SSCOFPMF' undeclared (first use in this function)
556 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF))
| ^~~~~~~~
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c:556:50: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
arch/riscv/kvm/aia.c: In function 'kvm_riscv_aia_init':
>> arch/riscv/kvm/aia.c:604:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
604 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SxAIA))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/riscv/kvm/aia.c:604:50: error: 'SxAIA' undeclared (first use in this function)
604 | if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SxAIA))
| ^~~~~
arch/riscv/kvm/aia.c:604:50: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c: In function 'pmu_sbi_setup_irqs':
>> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:803:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'riscv_isa_extension_available' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
803 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:803:49: error: 'SSCOFPMF' undeclared (first use in this function)
803 | if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF)) {
| ^~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:803:49: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +70 arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h
2350bd192fa2d9 Palmer Dabbelt 2023-02-02 64
2129a235c09896 Palmer Dabbelt 2017-07-10 65 /*
2350bd192fa2d9 Palmer Dabbelt 2023-02-02 66 * Provides information on the availiable set of ISA extensions to userspace,
2350bd192fa2d9 Palmer Dabbelt 2023-02-02 67 * via a bitmap that coorespends to each single-letter ISA extension. This is
2350bd192fa2d9 Palmer Dabbelt 2023-02-02 68 * essentially defunct, but will remain for compatibility with userspace.
2129a235c09896 Palmer Dabbelt 2017-07-10 69 */
50724efcb370c6 Andy Chiu 2023-06-05 @70 #define ELF_HWCAP riscv_get_elf_hwcap()
2129a235c09896 Palmer Dabbelt 2017-07-10 71 extern unsigned long elf_hwcap;
2129a235c09896 Palmer Dabbelt 2017-07-10 72
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-20 7:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] riscv: Optimize bitops with Zbb extension Xiao Wang
2023-09-20 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: Rearrange hwcap.h and cpufeature.h Xiao Wang
2023-09-20 8:29 ` Andrew Jones
2023-09-26 6:18 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-09-26 8:39 ` Wang, Xiao W
2023-09-20 7:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] riscv: Optimize bitops with Zbb extension Xiao Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202309201921.GvBmYK5q-lkp@intel.com \
--to=yujie.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=haicheng.li@intel.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox