public inbox for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>,
	"Atish Patra" <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	"Evan Green" <evan@rivosinc.com>,
	"Björn Topel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Ron Minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Maslowski" <cyrevolt@googlemail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] riscv: report misaligned accesses emulation to hwprobe
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 17:03:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230926150316.1129648-7-cleger@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230926150316.1129648-1-cleger@rivosinc.com>

hwprobe provides a way to report if misaligned access are emulated. In
order to correctly populate that feature, we can check if it actually
traps when doing a misaligned access. This can be checked using an
exception table entry which will actually be used when a misaligned
access is done from kernel mode.

Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h  |  6 +++
 arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c       |  6 ++-
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c            |  1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index d0345bd659c9..c1f0ef02cd7d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/bitmap.h>
 #include <asm/hwcap.h>
+#include <asm/hwprobe.h>
 
 /*
  * These are probed via a device_initcall(), via either the SBI or directly
@@ -32,4 +33,9 @@ extern struct riscv_isainfo hart_isa[NR_CPUS];
 
 void check_unaligned_access(int cpu);
 
+bool unaligned_ctl_available(void);
+
+bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu);
+void unaligned_emulation_finish(void);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 1cfbba65d11a..fbbde800bc21 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -568,6 +568,9 @@ void check_unaligned_access(int cpu)
 	void *src;
 	long speed = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW;
 
+	if (check_unaligned_access_emulated(cpu))
+		return;
+
 	page = alloc_pages(GFP_NOWAIT, get_order(MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE));
 	if (!page) {
 		pr_warn("Can't alloc pages to measure memcpy performance");
@@ -645,9 +648,10 @@ void check_unaligned_access(int cpu)
 	__free_pages(page, get_order(MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE));
 }
 
-static int check_unaligned_access_boot_cpu(void)
+static int __init check_unaligned_access_boot_cpu(void)
 {
 	check_unaligned_access(0);
+	unaligned_emulation_finish();
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index e600aab116a4..3af6ad4df7cf 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <asm/acpi.h>
 #include <asm/alternative.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
 #include <asm/early_ioremap.h>
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
index b5fb1ff078e3..fa81f6952fa4 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
@@ -9,11 +9,14 @@
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/stringify.h>
+#include <linux/prctl.h>
 
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
 #include <asm/csr.h>
 #include <asm/entry-common.h>
+#include <asm/hwprobe.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 
 #define INSN_MATCH_LB			0x3
 #define INSN_MASK_LB			0x707f
@@ -396,8 +399,10 @@ union reg_data {
 	u64 data_u64;
 };
 
+static bool unaligned_ctl __read_mostly;
+
 /* sysctl hooks */
-int unaligned_enabled __read_mostly = 1;	/* Enabled by default */
+int unaligned_enabled __read_mostly;
 
 int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
@@ -412,6 +417,9 @@ int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (!unaligned_enabled)
 		return -1;
 
+	if (user_mode(regs) && (current->thread.align_ctl & PR_UNALIGN_SIGBUS))
+		return -1;
+
 	if (get_insn(regs, epc, &insn))
 		return -1;
 
@@ -511,6 +519,9 @@ int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (!unaligned_enabled)
 		return -1;
 
+	if (user_mode(regs) && (current->thread.align_ctl & PR_UNALIGN_SIGBUS))
+		return -1;
+
 	if (get_insn(regs, epc, &insn))
 		return -1;
 
@@ -585,3 +596,53 @@ int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu)
+{
+	unsigned long emulated = 1, tmp_var;
+
+	/* Use a fixup to detect if misaligned access triggered an exception */
+	__asm__ __volatile__ (
+		"1:\n"
+		"	"REG_L" %[tmp], 1(%[ptr])\n"
+		"	li %[emulated], 0\n"
+		"2:\n"
+		_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b)
+	: [emulated] "+r" (emulated), [tmp] "=r" (tmp_var)
+	: [ptr] "r" (&tmp_var)
+	: "memory");
+
+	if (!emulated)
+		return false;
+
+	per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) =
+		RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+void __init unaligned_emulation_finish(void)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	/*
+	 * We can only support PR_UNALIGN controls if all CPUs have misaligned
+	 * accesses emulated since tasks requesting such control can run on any
+	 * CPU.
+	 */
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		if (per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) !=
+		    RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED) {
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+	unaligned_ctl = true;
+
+out:
+	unaligned_enabled = 1;
+}
+
+bool unaligned_ctl_available(void)
+{
+	return unaligned_ctl;
+}
-- 
2.40.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-26 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-26 15:03 [PATCH 0/7] Add support to handle misaligned accesses in S-mode Clément Léger
2023-09-26 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] riscv: remove unused functions in traps_misaligned.c Clément Léger
2023-09-26 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/7] riscv: add support for misaligned handling in S-mode Clément Léger
2023-09-26 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/7] riscv: report perf event for misaligned fault Clément Léger
2023-09-26 15:03 ` [PATCH 4/7] riscv: add floating point insn support to misaligned access emulation Clément Léger
2023-09-26 15:03 ` [PATCH 5/7] riscv: add support for sysctl unaligned_enabled control Clément Léger
2023-09-26 15:03 ` Clément Léger [this message]
2023-09-26 21:57   ` [PATCH 6/7] riscv: report misaligned accesses emulation to hwprobe Evan Green
2023-09-28  7:46     ` Clément Léger
2023-09-28 16:51       ` Evan Green
2023-10-03  9:50         ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-09-29  1:02   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-26 15:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] riscv: add support for PR_SET_UNALIGN and PR_GET_UNALIGN Clément Léger
2023-09-26 21:43 ` [PATCH 0/7] Add support to handle misaligned accesses in S-mode Evan Green
2023-09-28  7:49   ` Clément Léger
2023-09-28 16:48     ` Evan Green
2023-10-03  8:40       ` Atish Kumar Patra
2023-10-03 15:39         ` ron minnich
2023-09-30  9:23 ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-02  7:40   ` Clément Léger
2023-10-02 10:49     ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-02 11:18       ` Clément Léger
2023-10-02 15:32         ` ron minnich
2023-10-02 22:22           ` Jessica Clarke
2023-10-03 15:37             ` ron minnich
2023-10-03  8:12           ` Clément Léger
2023-10-04  8:26     ` David Laight
2023-10-04 10:03       ` Clément Léger
2023-10-04 14:10         ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230926150316.1129648-7-cleger@rivosinc.com \
    --to=cleger@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=cyrevolt@googlemail.com \
    --cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rminnich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox