From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Sean Young" <sean@mess.org>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Vladimir Zapolskiy" <vz@mleia.com>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
"Daire McNamara" <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Fabrice Gasnier" <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Sean Young <sean@mess.org>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: make it possible to apply pwm changes in atomic context
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 00:07:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202310012348.puyNjoMk-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bd5241d584ceb4d6b731c4dc3203fb9686ee1d1.1696156485.git.sean@mess.org>
Hi Sean,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on thierry-reding-pwm/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on shawnguo/for-next atorgue-stm32/stm32-next media-tree/master linus/master v6.6-rc3 next-20230929]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sean-Young/media-pwm-ir-tx-trigger-edges-from-hrtimer-interrupt-context/20231001-194056
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1bd5241d584ceb4d6b731c4dc3203fb9686ee1d1.1696156485.git.sean%40mess.org
patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: make it possible to apply pwm changes in atomic context
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-004-20231001 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231001/202310012348.puyNjoMk-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231001/202310012348.puyNjoMk-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310012348.puyNjoMk-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:27:0,
from arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:10,
from include/linux/sched.h:12,
from include/linux/ratelimit.h:6,
from include/linux/dev_printk.h:16,
from include/linux/device.h:15,
from include/linux/backlight.h:12,
from drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c:8:
include/linux/pwm.h: In function 'pwm_apply_state':
include/linux/pwm.h:428:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'pwm_can_sleep'; did you mean 'gpiod_cansleep'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
might_sleep_if(pwm_can_sleep(pwm));
^
include/linux/kernel.h:194:39: note: in definition of macro 'might_sleep_if'
#define might_sleep_if(cond) do { if (cond) might_sleep(); } while (0)
^~~~
In file included from drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c:16:0:
include/linux/pwm.h: At top level:
>> include/linux/pwm.h:455:20: error: conflicting types for 'pwm_can_sleep'
static inline bool pwm_can_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:27:0,
from arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:10,
from include/linux/sched.h:12,
from include/linux/ratelimit.h:6,
from include/linux/dev_printk.h:16,
from include/linux/device.h:15,
from include/linux/backlight.h:12,
from drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c:8:
include/linux/pwm.h:428:17: note: previous implicit declaration of 'pwm_can_sleep' was here
might_sleep_if(pwm_can_sleep(pwm));
^
include/linux/kernel.h:194:39: note: in definition of macro 'might_sleep_if'
#define might_sleep_if(cond) do { if (cond) might_sleep(); } while (0)
^~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:27:0,
from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
from include/linux/preempt.h:79,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/slab.h:16,
from include/linux/resource_ext.h:11,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/linux/i2c.h:13,
from drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c:11:
include/linux/pwm.h: In function 'pwm_apply_state':
include/linux/pwm.h:428:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'pwm_can_sleep'; did you mean 'cant_sleep'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
might_sleep_if(pwm_can_sleep(pwm));
^
include/linux/kernel.h:194:39: note: in definition of macro 'might_sleep_if'
#define might_sleep_if(cond) do { if (cond) might_sleep(); } while (0)
^~~~
In file included from drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c:18:0:
include/linux/pwm.h: At top level:
>> include/linux/pwm.h:455:20: error: conflicting types for 'pwm_can_sleep'
static inline bool pwm_can_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:27:0,
from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
from include/linux/preempt.h:79,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/slab.h:16,
from include/linux/resource_ext.h:11,
from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
from include/linux/i2c.h:13,
from drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c:11:
include/linux/pwm.h:428:17: note: previous implicit declaration of 'pwm_can_sleep' was here
might_sleep_if(pwm_can_sleep(pwm));
^
include/linux/kernel.h:194:39: note: in definition of macro 'might_sleep_if'
#define might_sleep_if(cond) do { if (cond) might_sleep(); } while (0)
^~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/pwm_can_sleep +455 include/linux/pwm.h
454
> 455 static inline bool pwm_can_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm)
456 {
457 return true;
458 }
459
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-01 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-01 10:40 [PATCH 0/2] Improve pwm-ir-tx precision Sean Young
2023-10-01 10:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] pwm: make it possible to apply pwm changes in atomic context Sean Young
2023-10-01 14:43 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-01 16:07 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-10-01 17:21 ` Sean Young
2023-10-04 9:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-05 8:30 ` Sean Young
2023-10-05 9:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-06 10:27 ` Thierry Reding
2023-10-06 14:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-10-06 10:29 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202310012348.puyNjoMk-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
--cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sean@mess.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).