From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15026E7AD75 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:04:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=mcfEVjRIdBYN1hj7THnN01P3ZM4YHc0RdR63sHKBjNU=; b=dbPmT77WvreCAf 0r7AoJAUAVna/T8jfkq5Me86ib1EHU4aRs853ZZY2eGyzvOQiLljnwsq+bFCQRvWWpANPyjn/tad7 k86371EELkU+H18dzYvleX6hk1ujaR1uZOkbOwmwJsIxYidIAcpp1XixEihQx+7AZKpsdgGIxsJiA VHOnMDtQCAw+JBlF75ZrdX4AXrTaL0pMCD11cm9alreiupr/25YsiTeGvCMG34q5bG8urvbvrfJUL amVMmUdhUtChAqpWwXwtkbmU01Adn5osLgdfbcGEN4i7oJeOw9aME45mH391cXjw0m/ehCcaznqGD 8nxbTiFCM0vAx1iodWOQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qnhtE-00Evxt-1r; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:04:52 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qnht9-00Evw3-2Q for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:04:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C33B81B2E; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C10DC433C7; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:04:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1696349085; bh=2On/qkTqbm10MdXL23I+Oxp4rttJLwBn1Qp7pFx8jrg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WLngFVkIoiK1RwDZP5NX97Ng0SWyqxQ6JOuNyMaFjIuTJtxK76q509aEHbhix01CI 3oUR2B/D+SknZN+HuqkGwrA5Wq65b+7CJSexdJBLwVb1U6nP/zMiz/shH7DOfCMdqh 2m+8aavUlOegf+fkrvbEtRaGpBAnTovivQbKivzo= Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 09:04:43 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Alexandre Ghiti Cc: Alexandre Ghiti , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Andrew Jones , Qinglin Pan , Ryan Roberts , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH -fixes 0/2] Fix set_huge_pte_at() Message-Id: <20231003090443.67a2e2692b68211e05b53248@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <305b4dec-c99d-3cee-4563-8d7dcbae9384@ghiti.fr> References: <20230928151846.8229-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com> <305b4dec-c99d-3cee-4563-8d7dcbae9384@ghiti.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231003_090447_962967_F503ADE9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.43 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:43:10 +0200 Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > +cc Andrew: Would=A0 you mind taking this patchset in your tree for the = > next rc? This patchset depends on a previous fix for arm64 that you = > merged in rc4 which is not in the riscv -fixes branch yet. > = > I saw with Palmer and he should ack this shortly. Well I grabbed them into mm.git's mm-hotfixes-unstable queue. All being well I'll move them into mm-hotfixes-stable within a week then into Linus shortly after. Unless something changes. It's odd that the riscv tree(s) aren't set up to merge fixes against -rc4? _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv