From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
xiao.w.wang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] RISC-V: Enable cbo.zero in usermode
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 19:03:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231010-442c4eec837dbab30e4c65ae@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK9=C2WdpsHoWvour0vwnCmG01qZiGq4-BQSLa25QdZ-2DJF0g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 07:52:10PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 7:00 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 06:15:21 PDT (-0700), ajones@ventanamicro.com wrote:
...
> > > +void riscv_user_isa_enable(void)
> > > +{
> > > + if (riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(smp_processor_id(), RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ))
> > > + csr_set(CSR_SENVCFG, ENVCFG_CBZE);
> >
> > It looks like CBZE didn't actually get ratified? The CMO extension says
> >
> > _The CMO extensions rely on state in {csrname} CSRs that will be defined in a
> > future update to the privileged architecture. If this CSR update is not
> > ratified, the CMO extension will define its own CSRs._
> >
> > but the privileged spec says
> >
> > The definition of the CBZE field will be furnished by the forthcoming
> > Zicboz extension. Its allocation within `senvcfg` may change prior to
> > the ratification of that extension.
> >
> > Is there some ratified spec that actually defines this?
>
> I see what you mean. The integration of these bits into the RISC-V
> priv spec has not happened hence we have the non-normative text
> in the CMO specification. The bit positions in xenvcfg CSRs can't
> change because it's already part of ratified CMO specification and
> there are organizations (like Ventana) who have implemented these
> bits.
>
Hi Palmer,
Does Anup's response satisfy the criteria for this? I'm wondering what, if
anything, I should do with this series. (The hwprobe-which-cpus series
is currently based on this series, because of the hwprobe selftests
changes, but I guess I could rework that.)
Thanks,
drew
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-10 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-18 13:15 [PATCH v4 0/6] RISC-V: Enable cbo.zero in usermode Andrew Jones
2023-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] RISC-V: Make zicbom/zicboz errors consistent Andrew Jones
2023-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] RISC-V: Enable cbo.zero in usermode Andrew Jones
2023-09-21 13:30 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-09-21 14:17 ` Anup Patel
2023-09-21 14:22 ` Anup Patel
2023-10-10 17:03 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2023-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] RISC-V: hwprobe: Expose Zicboz extension and its block size Andrew Jones
2023-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] RISC-V: selftests: Statically link hwprobe test Andrew Jones
2023-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] RISC-V: selftests: Convert hwprobe test to kselftest API Andrew Jones
2023-09-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] RISC-V: selftests: Add CBO tests Andrew Jones
2023-09-20 5:41 ` Wang, Xiao W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231010-442c4eec837dbab30e4c65ae@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox