[PATCH] RISC-V: hwprobe: Fix vDSO SIGSEGV

[Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>]

A hwprobe pair key is signed, but the hwprobe vDSO function was
only checking that the upper bound was valid. In order to help
avoid this type of problem in the future, and in anticipation of
this check becoming more complicated with sparse keys, introduce
and use a "key is valid" predicate function for the check.

Fixes: aa5af0aa90ba ("RISC-V: Add hwprobe vDSO function and data")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 5 +++++
 arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/hwprobe.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
index 78936f4ff513..7cad513538d8 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
@@ -10,4 +10,9 @@
 
 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 5
 
+static inline bool riscv_hwprobe_key_is_valid(__s64 key)
+{
+	return key >= 0 && key <= RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY;
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/hwprobe.c
index d40bec6ac078..cadf725ef798 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/hwprobe.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/hwprobe.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ int __vdso_riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe *pairs, size_t pair_count,
 
 	/* This is something we can handle, fill out the pairs. */
 	while (p < end) {
-		if (p->key <= RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY) {
+		if (riscv_hwprobe_key_is_valid(p->key)) {
 			p->value = avd->all_cpu_hwprobe_values[p->key];
 
 		} else {
-- 
2.41.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv