Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/cfi,bpf: Fix BPF JIT call

Peter Zijlstra
2023-12-08T20:57:01Z

On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 12:45:51PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:

> I mean we don't need to store a pointer to a func in stubs.
> Can it be, roughly:
>
> extern void bpf_tcp_ca_cong_avoid(struct sock *sk, u32 ack, u32 acked);
> KCFI_MACRO(hash_of_cong_avoid, bpf_tcp_ca_cong_avoid);
> u32 __array_of_kcfi_hash[] = {hash_of_cong_avoid, hash_of_set_state,...};
> .bpf_ops_stubs = __array_of_kcfi_hash,

But then how do I index this array? The bpf_ops_stubs thing having the
same layout at the target struct made it easy and we could use 'moff'
for both.

That also remains working if someone adds a member to the struct or
moves some members around.