From: guoren@kernel.org
To: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, guoren@kernel.org,
panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn, bjorn@rivosinc.com,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, leobras@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, anup@brainfault.org, keescook@chromium.org,
wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn, xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com,
chao.wei@sophgo.com, unicorn_wang@outlook.com, uwu@icenowy.me,
jszhang@kernel.org, wefu@redhat.com, atishp@atishpatra.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH V12 02/14] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Add separate ticket-lock.h
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 07:58:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231225125847.2778638-3-guoren@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231225125847.2778638-1-guoren@kernel.org>
From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Add a separate ticket-lock.h to include multiple spinlock versions and
select one at compile time or runtime.
Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAK8P3a2rnz9mQqhN6-e0CGUUv9rntRELFdxt_weiD7FxH7fkfQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
---
include/asm-generic/spinlock.h | 87 +---------------------
include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
index 4773334ee638..970590baf61b 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
@@ -1,94 +1,9 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
-/*
- * 'Generic' ticket-lock implementation.
- *
- * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress
- * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick
- * to a test-and-set lock.
- *
- * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a
- * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although
- * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications
- * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with
- * a test-and-set.
- *
- * It further assumes atomic_*_release() + atomic_*_acquire() is RCpc and hence
- * uses atomic_fetch_add() which is RCsc to create an RCsc hot path, along with
- * a full fence after the spin to upgrade the otherwise-RCpc
- * atomic_cond_read_acquire().
- *
- * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the
- * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word
- * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example).
- *
- */
-
#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H
#define __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H
-#include <linux/atomic.h>
-#include <asm-generic/spinlock_types.h>
-
-static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- u32 val = atomic_fetch_add(1<<16, &lock->val);
- u16 ticket = val >> 16;
-
- if (ticket == (u16)val)
- return;
-
- /*
- * atomic_cond_read_acquire() is RCpc, but rather than defining a
- * custom cond_read_rcsc() here we just emit a full fence. We only
- * need the prior reads before subsequent writes ordering from
- * smb_mb(), but as atomic_cond_read_acquire() just emits reads and we
- * have no outstanding writes due to the atomic_fetch_add() the extra
- * orderings are free.
- */
- atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, ticket == (u16)VAL);
- smp_mb();
-}
-
-static __always_inline bool arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- u32 old = atomic_read(&lock->val);
-
- if ((old >> 16) != (old & 0xffff))
- return false;
-
- return atomic_try_cmpxchg(&lock->val, &old, old + (1<<16)); /* SC, for RCsc */
-}
-
-static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
- u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
-
- smp_store_release(ptr, (u16)val + 1);
-}
-
-static __always_inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
-{
- u32 val = lock.val.counter;
-
- return ((val >> 16) == (val & 0xffff));
-}
-
-static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- arch_spinlock_t val = READ_ONCE(*lock);
-
- return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(val);
-}
-
-static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
-
- return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1;
-}
-
+#include <asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h>
#include <asm/qrwlock.h>
#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H */
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..cfcff22b37b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+
+/*
+ * 'Generic' ticket-lock implementation.
+ *
+ * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress
+ * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick
+ * to a test-and-set lock.
+ *
+ * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a
+ * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although
+ * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications
+ * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with
+ * a test-and-set.
+ *
+ * It further assumes atomic_*_release() + atomic_*_acquire() is RCpc and hence
+ * uses atomic_fetch_add() which is RCsc to create an RCsc hot path, along with
+ * a full fence after the spin to upgrade the otherwise-RCpc
+ * atomic_cond_read_acquire().
+ *
+ * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the
+ * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word
+ * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example).
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H
+#define __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H
+
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <asm-generic/spinlock_types.h>
+
+static __always_inline void ticket_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ u32 val = atomic_fetch_add(1<<16, &lock->val);
+ u16 ticket = val >> 16;
+
+ if (ticket == (u16)val)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * atomic_cond_read_acquire() is RCpc, but rather than defining a
+ * custom cond_read_rcsc() here we just emit a full fence. We only
+ * need the prior reads before subsequent writes ordering from
+ * smb_mb(), but as atomic_cond_read_acquire() just emits reads and we
+ * have no outstanding writes due to the atomic_fetch_add() the extra
+ * orderings are free.
+ */
+ atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, ticket == (u16)VAL);
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool ticket_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ u32 old = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+
+ if ((old >> 16) != (old & 0xffff))
+ return false;
+
+ return atomic_try_cmpxchg(&lock->val, &old, old + (1<<16)); /* SC, for RCsc */
+}
+
+static __always_inline void ticket_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
+ u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+
+ smp_store_release(ptr, (u16)val + 1);
+}
+
+static __always_inline int ticket_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
+{
+ u32 val = lock.val.counter;
+
+ return ((val >> 16) == (val & 0xffff));
+}
+
+static __always_inline int ticket_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ arch_spinlock_t val = READ_ONCE(*lock);
+
+ return !ticket_spin_value_unlocked(val);
+}
+
+static __always_inline int ticket_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+
+ return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Remapping spinlock architecture specific functions to the corresponding
+ * ticket spinlock functions.
+ */
+#define arch_spin_is_locked(l) ticket_spin_is_locked(l)
+#define arch_spin_is_contended(l) ticket_spin_is_contended(l)
+#define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l) ticket_spin_value_unlocked(l)
+#define arch_spin_lock(l) ticket_spin_lock(l)
+#define arch_spin_trylock(l) ticket_spin_trylock(l)
+#define arch_spin_unlock(l) ticket_spin_unlock(l)
+
+#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H */
--
2.40.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-25 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-25 12:58 [PATCH V12 00/14] riscv: Add Native/Paravirt qspinlock support guoren
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 01/14] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Reuse arch_spinlock_t of qspinlock guoren
2023-12-25 12:58 ` guoren [this message]
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 03/14] riscv: errata: Move errata vendor func-id into vendorid_list.h guoren
2024-01-04 4:00 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 04/14] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Add ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE fixup guoren
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 05/14] riscv: qspinlock: Add basic queued_spinlock support guoren
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 06/14] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce combo spinlock guoren
2024-01-04 4:56 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 07/14] riscv: qspinlock: Add virt_spin_lock() support for VM guest guoren
2024-01-04 5:06 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 08/14] riscv: qspinlock: Force virt_spin_lock for KVM guests guoren
2024-01-04 5:11 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 09/14] RISC-V: paravirt: Add pvqspinlock KVM backend guoren
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 10/14] RISC-V: paravirt: Add pvqspinlock frontend skeleton guoren
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 11/14] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add SBI implementation guoren
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 12/14] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add nopvspin kernel parameter guoren
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 13/14] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add kconfig entry guoren
2023-12-25 12:58 ` [PATCH V12 14/14] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add trace point for pv_kick/wait guoren
2023-12-26 0:35 ` [PATCH V12 00/14] riscv: Add Native/Paravirt qspinlock support Guo Ren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231225125847.2778638-3-guoren@kernel.org \
--to=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=chao.wei@sophgo.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=unicorn_wang@outlook.com \
--cc=uwu@icenowy.me \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wefu@redhat.com \
--cc=wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox