From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05122C3DA79 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:36:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date :Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=1prw8qVx9hQ4hZVJdIW4b6NlZ+oABuXES/sJDekwp90=; b=GDlJWIAM96P1KRxLOfqZYm2Gm1 Brw13RJWxea1erbXgmF9eBcn5ShBPs9S5e+seTCBh4pFR8wjpCb3vZFZtgFPSw/O43bSfGSyu3J7N qu5Jg1OSX9H9Ae0ggR4K3QaPDe/TLacXKuCVNG9gmCN7/qgYyrazCxSsI+eX0K294EroDOIe3O8nk duFMXf1NyRtPNzoZnKTxUkzunDkaIBh9tzKBLRQ7+/3Y5a1A+gpRQuCwoDFwnMCtdUbhEu/EOVabI dBbxIZ4TdeOWMZbqrig5Du6qQXVBJfpumHfooWJzh2bgs4jfXbhZiCs6TbigzCX6uTUO9MxyPkQya 142K/USg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rPPwb-009h32-0p; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:36:13 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rPPwY-009h2P-16 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:36:12 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E655BCE17C1; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE023C433C7; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:35:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1705336563; bh=xUGRPQ2EffaZwZLMEGtFK+oABfjvuI3uXumfT349cmM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=baIIcGGKasqctSxWoLvoIPPfrKaUFdbi3SU7f2+lkFCiFEVr5lQdbQDJDBiRNob/E S7mTeaClEEVSuokJ0I8H9bdImVf+TbIj8CKBxy0J74zjOmoDJRIzNdUcSgjMje6znx LgH63B0/kouOCHiikIdpJDupCsZ0aRUyFL0sGnh3KWOuVZlE+5JsTilI8jGyHbdWEK CoAI8C3SzUUYPb0F2YJf/4f0ef6A8y1AKTTHnPYVLeEGSZCiM2Na8RVeDenqP1mxGo yJP3rDXHZ5oItZjiLQ3p4bAnE3gsu6XrIs2G1yKP7Bf8A4aOAPuRDcnY4kkVX8o1Cg 199mFZfiOZYwA== Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:35:57 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Inochi Amaoto Cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chao Wei , Chen Wang , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Jisheng Zhang , Liu Gui , Jingbao Qiu , dlan@gentoo.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: sophgo: Add clock controller of SG2000 series SoC Message-ID: <20240115-spendable-achiness-cff7918fe810@spud> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240115_083610_753544_A6C56FC9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.06 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8584049508919596833==" Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============8584049508919596833== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TuBYItwW9BIAMewk" Content-Disposition: inline --TuBYItwW9BIAMewk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:16:58PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock > related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible > string is needed for the new SoC. >=20 > Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto > Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-= v1.0-alpha > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.ya= ml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml > index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml# > $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >=20 > -title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller > +title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller >=20 > maintainers: > - Inochi Amaoto > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties: > enum: > - sophgo,cv1800-clk > - sophgo,cv1810-clk > + - sophgo,sg2000-clk I recall before you mentioned that the Sophgo folks were considering renaming one of their devices. Is the sg2000 the renamed one, or a different chip? Thanks, Conor. --TuBYItwW9BIAMewk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZaVe7QAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0uRwAP9mzzbnJcU5NjK3wd0CYbLltUApBRsV7oVkt08heTojJwEA5gmuu8dEjtdJ 1GycIchYx+T0qBt3L2ppGCqwqlIiMQ8= =TyKR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TuBYItwW9BIAMewk-- --===============8584049508919596833== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv --===============8584049508919596833==--