From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Sia Jee Heng <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, sudeep.holla@arm.com, robh@kernel.org,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, suagrfillet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/2] riscv: Cache Population Code Refactoring for ACPI and DT Support
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:50:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240129-disburse-plug-9f4a37c550f3@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240129075957.116033-1-jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 905 bytes --]
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 11:59:55PM -0800, Sia Jee Heng wrote:
> This series of patches refactors the cache population function to
> seamlessly accommodate both DT and ACPI-based platforms. Additionally,
> to streamline the code, the unused parameter in the ci_leaf_init()
> function has been removed.
Why's this an RFC? I don't see any mention of why.
Thanks,
Conor.
>
> Sia Jee Heng (2):
> riscv: cacheinfo: Remove unused parameter
> riscv: cacheinfo: Refactor populate_cache_leaves()
>
> arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 50 ++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 41bccc98fb7931d63d03f326a746ac4d429c1dd3
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-29 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 7:59 [RFC v1 0/2] riscv: Cache Population Code Refactoring for ACPI and DT Support Sia Jee Heng
2024-01-29 7:59 ` [RFC v1 1/2] riscv: cacheinfo: Remove unused parameter Sia Jee Heng
2024-01-29 7:59 ` [RFC v1 2/2] riscv: cacheinfo: Refactor populate_cache_leaves() Sia Jee Heng
2024-01-29 12:30 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-30 6:24 ` JeeHeng Sia
2024-01-30 8:43 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-29 11:50 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2024-01-30 5:09 ` [RFC v1 0/2] riscv: Cache Population Code Refactoring for ACPI and DT Support JeeHeng Sia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240129-disburse-plug-9f4a37c550f3@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=suagrfillet@gmail.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox