From: Eric Chan <ericchancf@google.com>
To: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ericchancf@google.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
parri.andrea@gmail.com, emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com,
samuel.holland@sifive.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/4] riscv/barrier: Consolidate fence definitions
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 13:13:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240217131316.3668927-1-ericchancf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240217131206.3667544-1-ericchancf@google.com>
Disparate fence implementations are consolidated into fence.h.
Also introduce RISCV_FENCE_ASM to make fence macro more reusable.
Signed-off-by: Eric Chan <ericchancf@google.com>
---
v4 -> v5: __atomic_acquire_fence and __atomic_release_fence
omit-the-fence-on-uniprocessor optimization, and fix the typo of
RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER when spliting the patch in v3.
v3 -> v4 fix the form that can pass the checking of checkpatch.pl.
v1 -> v2: makes compilation pass with allyesconfig instead of
defconfig only, also satisfy scripts/checkpatch.pl.
- (__asm__ __volatile__ (RISCV_FENCE_ASM(p, s) : : : "memory"))
+ ({ __asm__ __volatile__ (RISCV_FENCE_ASM(p, s) : : : "memory"); })
arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h | 1 -
arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h | 3 +--
arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 1 -
arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h | 10 +++++++---
arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h | 8 ++++----
arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h | 5 +++--
arch/riscv/include/asm/mmiowb.h | 2 +-
7 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h
index 31e6e2e7cc18..0e0522e588ca 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
#endif
#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
-#include <asm/barrier.h>
#define __atomic_acquire_fence() \
__asm__ __volatile__(RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "" ::: "memory")
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h
index 173b44a989f8..15857dbc2279 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -11,13 +11,12 @@
#define _ASM_RISCV_BARRIER_H
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+#include <asm/fence.h>
#define nop() __asm__ __volatile__ ("nop")
#define __nops(n) ".rept " #n "\nnop\n.endr\n"
#define nops(n) __asm__ __volatile__ (__nops(n))
-#define RISCV_FENCE(p, s) \
- __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence " #p "," #s : : : "memory")
/* These barriers need to enforce ordering on both devices or memory. */
#define __mb() RISCV_FENCE(iorw, iorw)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index a608e4d1a0a4..2fee65cc8443 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
#include <linux/bug.h>
-#include <asm/barrier.h>
#include <asm/fence.h>
#define __xchg_relaxed(ptr, new, size) \
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h
index 6c26c44dfcd6..6bcd80325dfc 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h
@@ -1,10 +1,14 @@
#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H
#define _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H
+#define RISCV_FENCE_ASM(p, s) "\tfence " #p "," #s "\n"
+#define RISCV_FENCE(p, s) \
+ ({ __asm__ __volatile__ (RISCV_FENCE_ASM(p, s) : : : "memory"); })
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-#define RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "\tfence r , rw\n"
-#define RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER "\tfence rw, w\n"
-#define RISCV_FULL_BARRIER "\tfence rw, rw\n"
+#define RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER RISCV_FENCE_ASM(r, rw)
+#define RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER RISCV_FENCE_ASM(rw, w)
+#define RISCV_FULL_BARRIER RISCV_FENCE_ASM(rw, rw)
#else
#define RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
#define RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h
index 42497d487a17..1c5c641075d2 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h
@@ -47,10 +47,10 @@
* sufficient to ensure this works sanely on controllers that support I/O
* writes.
*/
-#define __io_pbr() __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence io,i" : : : "memory");
-#define __io_par(v) __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence i,ior" : : : "memory");
-#define __io_pbw() __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence iow,o" : : : "memory");
-#define __io_paw() __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence o,io" : : : "memory");
+#define __io_pbr() RISCV_FENCE(io, i)
+#define __io_par(v) RISCV_FENCE(i, ior)
+#define __io_pbw() RISCV_FENCE(iow, o)
+#define __io_paw() RISCV_FENCE(o, io)
/*
* Accesses from a single hart to a single I/O address must be ordered. This
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h
index 4c58ee7f95ec..06cadfd7a237 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#define _ASM_RISCV_MMIO_H
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <asm/fence.h>
#include <asm/mmiowb.h>
/* Generic IO read/write. These perform native-endian accesses. */
@@ -131,8 +132,8 @@ static inline u64 __raw_readq(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
* doesn't define any ordering between the memory space and the I/O space.
*/
#define __io_br() do {} while (0)
-#define __io_ar(v) ({ __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence i,ir" : : : "memory"); })
-#define __io_bw() ({ __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence w,o" : : : "memory"); })
+#define __io_ar(v) RISCV_FENCE(i, ir)
+#define __io_bw() RISCV_FENCE(w, o)
#define __io_aw() mmiowb_set_pending()
#define readb(c) ({ u8 __v; __io_br(); __v = readb_cpu(c); __io_ar(__v); __v; })
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmiowb.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmiowb.h
index 0b2333e71fdc..52ce4a399d9b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmiowb.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmiowb.h
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
* "o,w" is sufficient to ensure that all writes to the device have completed
* before the write to the spinlock is allowed to commit.
*/
-#define mmiowb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence o,w" : : : "memory");
+#define mmiowb() RISCV_FENCE(o, w)
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <asm-generic/mmiowb.h>
--
2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-17 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-17 13:12 [PATCH v6 0/4] riscv/barrier: tidying up barrier-related macro Eric Chan
2024-02-17 13:12 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] riscv/barrier: Define __{mb,rmb,wmb} Eric Chan
2024-02-17 13:13 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] riscv/barrier: Define RISCV_FULL_BARRIER Eric Chan
2024-02-17 13:13 ` Eric Chan [this message]
2024-02-17 13:13 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] riscv/barrier: Add missing space after ',' Eric Chan
2024-02-19 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] riscv/barrier: tidying up barrier-related macro Andrea Parri
2024-03-12 4:49 ` Samuel Holland
2024-03-20 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240217131316.3668927-1-ericchancf@google.com \
--to=ericchancf@google.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).