From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04EBBC54E4A for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 19:06:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:In-Reply-To:References:Message-Id :MIME-Version:Subject:Date:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=N6KMV2y/UZNaN62biI+fvSxnQznlfdivjvZybucpvkA=; b=Ncy0npmgeWEJvz R0LpMEUo3a2kPiwLEdUWSSWxyoCeLWlJZCwolJV5M+eiFHk+3ye4fhKqPXGD0CNPxjOpLGDyPDtis Rh4VjmpgftxUp0aEMi7mdqwOvcyGbSQsA3zNJQBC3Yhua/xQhenEDjYTgTpJKrr5PufDw1gLJo1RY RzdHqfT8xdR23zMEDxYhTthjSBV2UJbGI3m16ewpM7Ach4hSV6lZP15p4uJAPgVijM1V5/wTa6oGq 7klVs/WxI9FgVNdgt0FJpUxwktIXzIEKfFIFx9F6U/hWvOK67d2d1w8y2JwlG9NSTPFadeihAbVdk dV0/LCMDE9Xd1hkA5f3Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1riJ4F-00000005yb9-2zsb; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 19:06:11 +0000 Received: from desiato.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1riJ47-00000005yVk-3H9Z for linux-riscv@bombadil.infradead.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 19:06:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Cc:To:In-Reply-To:References: Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:Date: From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=+kRgKvy2tDZROsLBE4TRNc3vK6NXitWNpMmv1T0d9X8=; b=lMMX5V/7dDuPCLrBK8Q8YKIaFo eAQqL2dQK79w7ygprTz4hkJX/auq6GkUWGR1AAlzuBzNQMlayM/rBWGOMeR+ubJ4djmauXHkKiZ9R d9ZmBBDFk4qwmrG91+ZjHwd4h9RPY4LmZY1ZV+y5MseXdnDuXgQNfZMUTaXi4NZ0HVuNS/G5RugPq yDGwwELuOhBJK1Y3fLi2aX3zOdNfsFFIlhfVoUyd1mChjrB+8ktjhluranJBpT8laC3rnw5wzIobK rofX6NJapzclFXSTyDWmJPAfX14c6DVJPWKZiYzTHQ9+AkLr0R5djMBN0yinJFZWaC0PWM1FsEegP xOKww2VQ==; Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1riJ44-00000006rTW-2kHp for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 19:06:02 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1dcd6a3da83so9058175ad.3 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:06:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1709838358; x=1710443158; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+kRgKvy2tDZROsLBE4TRNc3vK6NXitWNpMmv1T0d9X8=; b=OQjr8r2lHubSnAtQwVRuWbo0wnLbIToqCDljEVrIvZlLvi8s+1FNKu4X/V8YhaSnIo aSSN6Q4QbDMCDMNCMLuxcINUuiV1qIV0gFR9Elzp7dKcoivnveue3uCoNLY3+eC8Aicv TTkcCE233dZC+bEvc0GRDX9nEQe2kiOZ+TrLdwL7KLo8j+SrAMNQH69nGWJtSpmu/M3o PRmrdZOBbD+thWuMtYmK4H4DdtUpNzXux1LA7gwKtq4fqPBkZzqf0h5Z0PsgDzp6DBDF h6gwlqvgB3BH+bYYO/o2EqYgwmijTOgJYnw+EOkj/K2hAMmdPHhiS5EwvHos7LgNgwyD Ticg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709838358; x=1710443158; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+kRgKvy2tDZROsLBE4TRNc3vK6NXitWNpMmv1T0d9X8=; b=PWvjHIAvPCCovy3mQeF7UUfbxGyuo9g4MqWLtRSVuHOCqZAyMTRHSWO17iIHbhRIvj JfAM05mRNb2tH/qDVySiXabmyOEq1mMOnd2UXGjQ+Wk80dZ2se4HauzvQjG3Dqd5Sw2Z S55mp6NQ3nP4UlVzjrmR+SGLaqUlIdCT4M14j1g7Lj24goiT9OE4sveud7MRadF9+vvj akhuFmr9OybQq38vOppHrbLVTTYbb6NJxbq39X823rzbFh0mNj4oK+1J7EvWdbaIQnFB j5HSWcpIF6NdsLhJ41K6LUh0S2UkkxMGuDfCnzxNDglHZ93RRARxd9S/wKQGHdKF6+6R 9vTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YywzEFsTMGweuSH8GleKKPaBGSnJSpMw3KvpSaApzosFFNkPQu2 xnXCrx2WTUpncdfhi6CpuJELdjkAczTjZO6eqWoCEgSTP+57Nlk8KiwlyplJZvY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH7dtXgBzXcjt1MX/4VQ6f1NSrjHQ7P0vdV3ZZCej7grdjYrZUrGgpFKLvzBknn631GDphA2w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a986:b0:1dc:6e6f:5a33 with SMTP id bh6-20020a170902a98600b001dc6e6f5a33mr8114715plb.43.1709838358461; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:05:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from charlie.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h3-20020a170902680300b001dd526af36csm1747338plk.295.2024.03.07.11.05.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:05:57 -0800 (PST) From: Charlie Jenkins Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:05:48 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v8 4/4] riscv: Set unaligned access speed at compile time MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20240307-disable_misaligned_probe_config-v8-4-55d696cb398b@rivosinc.com> References: <20240307-disable_misaligned_probe_config-v8-0-55d696cb398b@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20240307-disable_misaligned_probe_config-v8-0-55d696cb398b@rivosinc.com> To: Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Jisheng Zhang , Evan Green , =?utf-8?q?Cl=C3=A9ment_L=C3=A9ger?= , Eric Biggers , Elliot Berman , Charles Lohr , Conor Dooley Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Charlie Jenkins X-Mailer: b4 0.12.3 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; t=1709838351; l=25831; i=charlie@rivosinc.com; s=20231120; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=lnMJWIpDWdTswrXX6v2faY2UZNpWSZLqFcxqdatd22s=; b=9Sds+u3zq+URUmp/F0mAoAW/zes1QItqJKmINvRKciP+mZ5VHikiXyLcdqNl7STKn83rdVwF9 oyRpZJ3yls7AkJryzU5/nPAHk54kq9NPjssBhPJeUm6L877aPB2iTwY X-Developer-Key: i=charlie@rivosinc.com; a=ed25519; pk=t4RSWpMV1q5lf/NWIeR9z58bcje60/dbtxxmoSfBEcs= X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240307_190600_974254_CEA17F2A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 29.26 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Introduce Kconfig options to set the kernel unaligned access support. These options provide a non-portable alternative to the runtime unaligned access probe. To support this, the unaligned access probing code is moved into it's own file and gated behind a new RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_SUPPORT option. Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 60 ++++-- arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 24 +-- arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 4 +- arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 272 ---------------------------- arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 13 ++ arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 2 + arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 282 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 361 insertions(+), 296 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index bffbd869a068..28c1e75ea88a 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -688,27 +688,63 @@ config THREAD_SIZE_ORDER affects irq stack size, which is equal to thread stack size. config RISCV_MISALIGNED - bool "Support misaligned load/store traps for kernel and userspace" + bool select SYSCTL_ARCH_UNALIGN_ALLOW - default y help - Say Y here if you want the kernel to embed support for misaligned - load/store for both kernel and userspace. When disable, misaligned - accesses will generate SIGBUS in userspace and panic in kernel. + Embed support for misaligned load/store for both kernel and userspace. + When disabled, misaligned accesses will generate SIGBUS in userspace + and panic in the kernel. + +choice + prompt "Unaligned Accesses Support" + default RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + help + This determines the level of support for unaligned accesses. This + information is used by the kernel to perform optimizations. It is also + exposed to user space via the hwprobe syscall. The hardware will be + probed at boot by default. + +config RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + bool "Probe for hardware unaligned access support" + select RISCV_MISALIGNED + help + During boot, the kernel will run a series of tests to determine the + speed of unaligned accesses. This probing will dynamically determine + the speed of unaligned accesses on the underlying system. If unaligned + memory accesses trap into the kernel as they are not supported by the + system, the kernel will emulate the unaligned accesses to preserve the + UABI. + +config RISCV_EMULATED_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + bool "Emulate unaligned access where system support is missing" + select RISCV_MISALIGNED + help + If unaligned memory accesses trap into the kernel as they are not + supported by the system, the kernel will emulate the unaligned + accesses to preserve the UABI. When the underlying system does support + unaligned accesses, the unaligned accesses are assumed to be slow. + +config RISCV_SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + bool "Assume the system supports slow unaligned memory accesses" + depends on NONPORTABLE + help + Assume that the system supports slow unaligned memory accesses. The + kernel and userspace programs may not be able to run at all on systems + that do not support unaligned memory accesses. config RISCV_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS - bool "Assume the CPU supports fast unaligned memory accesses" + bool "Assume the system supports fast unaligned memory accesses" depends on NONPORTABLE select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS if MMU select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS help - Say Y here if you want the kernel to assume that the CPU supports - efficient unaligned memory accesses. When enabled, this option - improves the performance of the kernel on such CPUs. However, the - kernel will run much more slowly, or will not be able to run at all, - on CPUs that do not support efficient unaligned memory accesses. + Assume that the system supports fast unaligned memory accesses. When + enabled, this option improves the performance of the kernel on such + systems. However, the kernel and userspace programs will run much more + slowly, or will not be able to run at all, on systems that do not + support efficient unaligned memory accesses. - If unsure what to do here, say N. +endchoice endmenu # "Platform type" diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h index 6fec91845aa0..46061f5e9764 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -28,37 +28,39 @@ struct riscv_isainfo { DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct riscv_cpuinfo, riscv_cpuinfo); -DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed); - /* Per-cpu ISA extensions. */ extern struct riscv_isainfo hart_isa[NR_CPUS]; void riscv_user_isa_enable(void); -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED -bool unaligned_ctl_available(void); +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void); void unaligned_emulation_finish(void); +bool unaligned_ctl_available(void); +DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed); #else static inline bool unaligned_ctl_available(void) { return false; } - -static inline bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu) -{ - return false; -} - -static inline void unaligned_emulation_finish(void) {} #endif +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(fast_unaligned_access_speed_key); static __always_inline bool has_fast_unaligned_accesses(void) { return static_branch_likely(&fast_unaligned_access_speed_key); } +#else +static __always_inline bool has_fast_unaligned_accesses(void) +{ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) + return true; + else + return false; +} +#endif unsigned long riscv_get_elf_hwcap(void); diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile index f71910718053..c8085126a6f9 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ extra-y += vmlinux.lds obj-y += head.o obj-y += soc.o obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE) += alternative.o -obj-y += copy-unaligned.o obj-y += cpu.o obj-y += cpufeature.o obj-y += entry.o @@ -62,6 +61,9 @@ obj-y += tests/ obj-$(CONFIG_MMU) += vdso.o vdso/ obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) += traps_misaligned.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) += unaligned_access_speed.o +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) += copy-unaligned.o + obj-$(CONFIG_FPU) += fpu.o obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V) += vector.o obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V) += kernel_mode_vector.o diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c index abb3a2f53106..319670af5704 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include #include #include #include @@ -21,20 +20,12 @@ #include #include #include -#include #include #include #include -#include "copy-unaligned.h" - #define NUM_ALPHA_EXTS ('z' - 'a' + 1) -#define MISALIGNED_ACCESS_JIFFIES_LG2 1 -#define MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE 0x4000 -#define MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER get_order(MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE) -#define MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE ((MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE / 2) - 0x80) - unsigned long elf_hwcap __read_mostly; /* Host ISA bitmap */ @@ -43,11 +34,6 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(riscv_isa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX) __read_mostly; /* Per-cpu ISA extensions. */ struct riscv_isainfo hart_isa[NR_CPUS]; -/* Performance information */ -DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed); - -static cpumask_t fast_misaligned_access; - /** * riscv_isa_extension_base() - Get base extension word * @@ -706,264 +692,6 @@ unsigned long riscv_get_elf_hwcap(void) return hwcap; } -static int check_unaligned_access(void *param) -{ - int cpu = smp_processor_id(); - u64 start_cycles, end_cycles; - u64 word_cycles; - u64 byte_cycles; - int ratio; - unsigned long start_jiffies, now; - struct page *page = param; - void *dst; - void *src; - long speed = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW; - - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED) && - per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN) - return 0; - - /* Make an unaligned destination buffer. */ - dst = (void *)((unsigned long)page_address(page) | 0x1); - /* Unalign src as well, but differently (off by 1 + 2 = 3). */ - src = dst + (MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE / 2); - src += 2; - word_cycles = -1ULL; - /* Do a warmup. */ - __riscv_copy_words_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); - preempt_disable(); - start_jiffies = jiffies; - while ((now = jiffies) == start_jiffies) - cpu_relax(); - - /* - * For a fixed amount of time, repeatedly try the function, and take - * the best time in cycles as the measurement. - */ - while (time_before(jiffies, now + (1 << MISALIGNED_ACCESS_JIFFIES_LG2))) { - start_cycles = get_cycles64(); - /* Ensure the CSR read can't reorder WRT to the copy. */ - mb(); - __riscv_copy_words_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); - /* Ensure the copy ends before the end time is snapped. */ - mb(); - end_cycles = get_cycles64(); - if ((end_cycles - start_cycles) < word_cycles) - word_cycles = end_cycles - start_cycles; - } - - byte_cycles = -1ULL; - __riscv_copy_bytes_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); - start_jiffies = jiffies; - while ((now = jiffies) == start_jiffies) - cpu_relax(); - - while (time_before(jiffies, now + (1 << MISALIGNED_ACCESS_JIFFIES_LG2))) { - start_cycles = get_cycles64(); - mb(); - __riscv_copy_bytes_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); - mb(); - end_cycles = get_cycles64(); - if ((end_cycles - start_cycles) < byte_cycles) - byte_cycles = end_cycles - start_cycles; - } - - preempt_enable(); - - /* Don't divide by zero. */ - if (!word_cycles || !byte_cycles) { - pr_warn("cpu%d: rdtime lacks granularity needed to measure unaligned access speed\n", - cpu); - - return 0; - } - - if (word_cycles < byte_cycles) - speed = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST; - - ratio = div_u64((byte_cycles * 100), word_cycles); - pr_info("cpu%d: Ratio of byte access time to unaligned word access is %d.%02d, unaligned accesses are %s\n", - cpu, - ratio / 100, - ratio % 100, - (speed == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST) ? "fast" : "slow"); - - per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) = speed; - - /* - * Set the value of fast_misaligned_access of a CPU. These operations - * are atomic to avoid race conditions. - */ - if (speed == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST) - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &fast_misaligned_access); - else - cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &fast_misaligned_access); - - return 0; -} - -static void check_unaligned_access_nonboot_cpu(void *param) -{ - unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); - struct page **pages = param; - - if (smp_processor_id() != 0) - check_unaligned_access(pages[cpu]); -} - -DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(fast_unaligned_access_speed_key); - -static void modify_unaligned_access_branches(cpumask_t *mask, int weight) -{ - if (cpumask_weight(mask) == weight) - static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&fast_unaligned_access_speed_key); - else - static_branch_disable_cpuslocked(&fast_unaligned_access_speed_key); -} - -static void set_unaligned_access_static_branches_except_cpu(int cpu) -{ - /* - * Same as set_unaligned_access_static_branches, except excludes the - * given CPU from the result. When a CPU is hotplugged into an offline - * state, this function is called before the CPU is set to offline in - * the cpumask, and thus the CPU needs to be explicitly excluded. - */ - - cpumask_t fast_except_me; - - cpumask_and(&fast_except_me, &fast_misaligned_access, cpu_online_mask); - cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &fast_except_me); - - modify_unaligned_access_branches(&fast_except_me, num_online_cpus() - 1); -} - -static void set_unaligned_access_static_branches(void) -{ - /* - * This will be called after check_unaligned_access_all_cpus so the - * result of unaligned access speed for all CPUs will be available. - * - * To avoid the number of online cpus changing between reading - * cpu_online_mask and calling num_online_cpus, cpus_read_lock must be - * held before calling this function. - */ - - cpumask_t fast_and_online; - - cpumask_and(&fast_and_online, &fast_misaligned_access, cpu_online_mask); - - modify_unaligned_access_branches(&fast_and_online, num_online_cpus()); -} - -static int lock_and_set_unaligned_access_static_branch(void) -{ - cpus_read_lock(); - set_unaligned_access_static_branches(); - cpus_read_unlock(); - - return 0; -} - -arch_initcall_sync(lock_and_set_unaligned_access_static_branch); - -static int riscv_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu) -{ - static struct page *buf; - - /* We are already set since the last check */ - if (per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN) - goto exit; - - buf = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); - if (!buf) { - pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n"); - return -ENOMEM; - } - - check_unaligned_access(buf); - __free_pages(buf, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); - -exit: - set_unaligned_access_static_branches(); - - return 0; -} - -static int riscv_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu) -{ - set_unaligned_access_static_branches_except_cpu(cpu); - - return 0; -} - -/* Measure unaligned access speed on all CPUs present at boot in parallel. */ -static int check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void) -{ - unsigned int cpu; - unsigned int cpu_count = num_possible_cpus(); - struct page **bufs = kzalloc(cpu_count * sizeof(struct page *), - GFP_KERNEL); - - if (!bufs) { - pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n"); - return 0; - } - - /* - * Allocate separate buffers for each CPU so there's no fighting over - * cache lines. - */ - for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) { - bufs[cpu] = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); - if (!bufs[cpu]) { - pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n"); - goto out; - } - } - - /* Check everybody except 0, who stays behind to tend jiffies. */ - on_each_cpu(check_unaligned_access_nonboot_cpu, bufs, 1); - - /* Check core 0. */ - smp_call_on_cpu(0, check_unaligned_access, bufs[0], true); - - /* - * Setup hotplug callbacks for any new CPUs that come online or go - * offline. - */ - cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv:online", - riscv_online_cpu, riscv_offline_cpu); - -out: - for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) { - if (bufs[cpu]) - __free_pages(bufs[cpu], MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); - } - - kfree(bufs); - return 0; -} - -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED -static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void) -{ - bool all_cpus_emulated = check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); - - if (!all_cpus_emulated) - return check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(); - - return 0; -} -#else -static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void) -{ - return check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(); -} -#endif - -arch_initcall(check_unaligned_access_all_cpus); - void riscv_user_isa_enable(void) { if (riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(smp_processor_id(), RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ)) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c index a7c56b41efd2..8cae41a502dd 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ static bool hwprobe_ext0_has(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long ext) return (pair.value & ext); } +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) { int cpu; @@ -169,6 +170,18 @@ static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) return perf; } +#else +static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus) +{ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) + return RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST; + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_EMULATED_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && unaligned_ctl_available()) + return RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED; + + return RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW; +} +#endif static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, const struct cpumask *cpus) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c index e55718179f42..2adb7c3e4dd5 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c @@ -413,7 +413,9 @@ int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs) perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS, 1, regs, addr); +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS *this_cpu_ptr(&misaligned_access_speed) = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED; +#endif if (!unaligned_enabled) return -1; diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..52264ea4f0bd --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c @@ -0,0 +1,282 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright 2024 Rivos Inc. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "copy-unaligned.h" + +#define MISALIGNED_ACCESS_JIFFIES_LG2 1 +#define MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE 0x4000 +#define MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER get_order(MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE) +#define MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE ((MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE / 2) - 0x80) + +DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed); + +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS +static cpumask_t fast_misaligned_access; +static int check_unaligned_access(void *param) +{ + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + u64 start_cycles, end_cycles; + u64 word_cycles; + u64 byte_cycles; + int ratio; + unsigned long start_jiffies, now; + struct page *page = param; + void *dst; + void *src; + long speed = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW; + + if (per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN) + return 0; + + /* Make an unaligned destination buffer. */ + dst = (void *)((unsigned long)page_address(page) | 0x1); + /* Unalign src as well, but differently (off by 1 + 2 = 3). */ + src = dst + (MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE / 2); + src += 2; + word_cycles = -1ULL; + /* Do a warmup. */ + __riscv_copy_words_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + preempt_disable(); + start_jiffies = jiffies; + while ((now = jiffies) == start_jiffies) + cpu_relax(); + + /* + * For a fixed amount of time, repeatedly try the function, and take + * the best time in cycles as the measurement. + */ + while (time_before(jiffies, now + (1 << MISALIGNED_ACCESS_JIFFIES_LG2))) { + start_cycles = get_cycles64(); + /* Ensure the CSR read can't reorder WRT to the copy. */ + mb(); + __riscv_copy_words_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + /* Ensure the copy ends before the end time is snapped. */ + mb(); + end_cycles = get_cycles64(); + if ((end_cycles - start_cycles) < word_cycles) + word_cycles = end_cycles - start_cycles; + } + + byte_cycles = -1ULL; + __riscv_copy_bytes_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + start_jiffies = jiffies; + while ((now = jiffies) == start_jiffies) + cpu_relax(); + + while (time_before(jiffies, now + (1 << MISALIGNED_ACCESS_JIFFIES_LG2))) { + start_cycles = get_cycles64(); + mb(); + __riscv_copy_bytes_unaligned(dst, src, MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE); + mb(); + end_cycles = get_cycles64(); + if ((end_cycles - start_cycles) < byte_cycles) + byte_cycles = end_cycles - start_cycles; + } + + preempt_enable(); + + /* Don't divide by zero. */ + if (!word_cycles || !byte_cycles) { + pr_warn("cpu%d: rdtime lacks granularity needed to measure unaligned access speed\n", + cpu); + + return 0; + } + + if (word_cycles < byte_cycles) + speed = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST; + + ratio = div_u64((byte_cycles * 100), word_cycles); + pr_info("cpu%d: Ratio of byte access time to unaligned word access is %d.%02d, unaligned accesses are %s\n", + cpu, + ratio / 100, + ratio % 100, + (speed == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST) ? "fast" : "slow"); + + per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) = speed; + + /* + * Set the value of fast_misaligned_access of a CPU. These operations + * are atomic to avoid race conditions. + */ + if (speed == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST) + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &fast_misaligned_access); + else + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &fast_misaligned_access); + + return 0; +} + +static void check_unaligned_access_nonboot_cpu(void *param) +{ + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + struct page **pages = param; + + if (smp_processor_id() != 0) + check_unaligned_access(pages[cpu]); +} + +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(fast_unaligned_access_speed_key); + +static void modify_unaligned_access_branches(cpumask_t *mask, int weight) +{ + if (cpumask_weight(mask) == weight) + static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&fast_unaligned_access_speed_key); + else + static_branch_disable_cpuslocked(&fast_unaligned_access_speed_key); +} + +static void set_unaligned_access_static_branches_except_cpu(int cpu) +{ + /* + * Same as set_unaligned_access_static_branches, except excludes the + * given CPU from the result. When a CPU is hotplugged into an offline + * state, this function is called before the CPU is set to offline in + * the cpumask, and thus the CPU needs to be explicitly excluded. + */ + + cpumask_t fast_except_me; + + cpumask_and(&fast_except_me, &fast_misaligned_access, cpu_online_mask); + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &fast_except_me); + + modify_unaligned_access_branches(&fast_except_me, num_online_cpus() - 1); +} + +static void set_unaligned_access_static_branches(void) +{ + /* + * This will be called after check_unaligned_access_all_cpus so the + * result of unaligned access speed for all CPUs will be available. + * + * To avoid the number of online cpus changing between reading + * cpu_online_mask and calling num_online_cpus, cpus_read_lock must be + * held before calling this function. + */ + + cpumask_t fast_and_online; + + cpumask_and(&fast_and_online, &fast_misaligned_access, cpu_online_mask); + + modify_unaligned_access_branches(&fast_and_online, num_online_cpus()); +} + +static int lock_and_set_unaligned_access_static_branch(void) +{ + cpus_read_lock(); + set_unaligned_access_static_branches(); + cpus_read_unlock(); + + return 0; +} + +arch_initcall_sync(lock_and_set_unaligned_access_static_branch); + +static int riscv_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu) +{ + static struct page *buf; + + /* We are already set since the last check */ + if (per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN) + goto exit; + + buf = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); + if (!buf) { + pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n"); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + check_unaligned_access(buf); + __free_pages(buf, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); + +exit: + set_unaligned_access_static_branches(); + + return 0; +} + +static int riscv_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu) +{ + set_unaligned_access_static_branches_except_cpu(cpu); + + return 0; +} + +/* Measure unaligned access speed on all CPUs present at boot in parallel. */ +static int check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void) +{ + unsigned int cpu; + unsigned int cpu_count = num_possible_cpus(); + struct page **bufs = kzalloc(cpu_count * sizeof(struct page *), + GFP_KERNEL); + + if (!bufs) { + pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n"); + return 0; + } + + /* + * Allocate separate buffers for each CPU so there's no fighting over + * cache lines. + */ + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) { + bufs[cpu] = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); + if (!bufs[cpu]) { + pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n"); + goto out; + } + } + + /* Check everybody except 0, who stays behind to tend jiffies. */ + on_each_cpu(check_unaligned_access_nonboot_cpu, bufs, 1); + + /* Check core 0. */ + smp_call_on_cpu(0, check_unaligned_access, bufs[0], true); + + /* + * Setup hotplug callbacks for any new CPUs that come online or go + * offline. + */ + cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv:online", + riscv_online_cpu, riscv_offline_cpu); + +out: + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) { + if (bufs[cpu]) + __free_pages(bufs[cpu], MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER); + } + + kfree(bufs); + return 0; +} + +static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void) +{ + bool all_cpus_emulated = check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); + + if (!all_cpus_emulated) + return check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(); + + return 0; +} +#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */ +static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void) +{ + check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(); + + return 0; +} +#endif + +arch_initcall(check_unaligned_access_all_cpus); -- 2.43.2 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv