Re: [PATCH v3 05/29] riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp enumeration

Andy Chiu
2024-05-09T00:01:30Z

Hi Deepak,

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 7:41 AM Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> This patch adds support for detecting zicfiss and zicfilp. zicfiss and
> zicfilp stands for unprivleged integer spec extension for shadow stack
> and branch tracking on indirect branches, respectively.
>
> This patch looks for zicfiss and zicfilp in device tree and accordinlgy
> lights up bit in cpu feature bitmap. Furthermore this patch adds detection
> utility functions to return whether shadow stack or landing pads are
> supported by cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 2 ++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 0bd11862b760..f0fb8d8ae273 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> #include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
> #include <asm/errno.h>
> @@ -137,4 +138,16 @@ static __always_inline bool riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(int cpu, const unsi
>
> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(fast_misaligned_access_speed_key);
>
> +static inline bool cpu_supports_shadow_stack(void)
> +{
> + return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI) &&
> + riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(smp_processor_id(), RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFISS));
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr(void)
> +{
> + return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI) &&
> + riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(smp_processor_id(), RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFILP));
> +}
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> index 1f2d2599c655..74b6c727f545 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFA 71
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZTSO 72
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS 73
nit: two tabs for alignment

> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFILP 74
> +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFISS 75
>
> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG 127
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> index a8509cc31ab2..6c5b3d928b12 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <vdso/processor.h>
>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> +#include <asm/hwcap.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1))
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 79a5a35fab96..d052cad5b82f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -263,6 +263,8 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(h, RISCV_ISA_EXT_h),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
> + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicfilp, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFILP, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
> + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicfiss, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFISS, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicntr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICNTR),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicond, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICOND),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicsr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR),
> --
> 2.43.2
>

Thanks,
Andy