Re: [PATCH 07/10] riscv: add ISA extension parsing for Zcmop

[Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2114 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:08:21AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> >> If we consider to have potentially broken isa string (ie extensions
> >> dependencies not correctly handled), then we'll need some way to
> >> validate this within the kernel.
> > 
> > No, the DT passed to the kernel should be correct and we by and large we
> > should not have to do validation of it. What I meant above was writing
> > the binding so that something invalid will not pass dtbs_check.
> 
> Acked, I was mainly answering Deepak question about dependencies wrt to
> using __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET() which does not seems to be relevant
> since we expect a correct isa string to be passed.

Ahh, okay.

> But as you stated, DT
> validation clearly make sense. I think a lot of extensions strings would
> benefit such support (All the Zv* depends on V, etc).

I think it is actually as simple something like this, which makes it
invalid to have "d" without "f":

| diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
| index 468c646247aa..594828700cbe 100644
| --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
| +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
| @@ -484,5 +484,20 @@ properties:
|              Registers in the AX45MP datasheet.
|              https://www.andestech.com/wp-content/uploads/AX45MP-1C-Rev.-5.0.0-Datasheet.pdf
|  
| +allOf:
| +  - if:
| +      properties:
| +        riscv,isa-extensions:
| +          contains:
| +            const: "d"
| +          not:
| +            contains:
| +              const: "f"
| +    then:
| +      properties:
| +        riscv,isa-extensions:
| +          false
| +
| +
|  additionalProperties: true
|  ...

If you do have d without f, the checker will say:
cpu@2: riscv,isa-extensions: False schema does not allow ['i', 'm', 'a', 'd', 'c']

At least that's readable, even though not clear about what to do. I wish
the former could be said about the wall of text you get for /each/
undocumented entry in the string.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv