From: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
To: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
tjeznach@rivosinc.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, jgg@ziepe.ca,
kevin.tian@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] iommu/riscv: use data structure instead of individual values
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 22:21:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240614142156.29420-4-zong.li@sifive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240614142156.29420-1-zong.li@sifive.com>
The parameter will be increased when we need to set up more
bit fields in the device context. Use a data structure to
wrap them up.
Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
---
drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
index 1716b2251f38..9aeb4b20c145 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
@@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ static void riscv_iommu_iotlb_inval(struct riscv_iommu_domain *domain,
* interim translation faults.
*/
static void riscv_iommu_iodir_update(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
- struct device *dev, u64 fsc, u64 ta)
+ struct device *dev, struct riscv_iommu_dc *new_dc)
{
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_dc *dc;
@@ -1079,10 +1079,10 @@ static void riscv_iommu_iodir_update(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
dc = riscv_iommu_get_dc(iommu, fwspec->ids[i]);
tc = READ_ONCE(dc->tc);
- tc |= ta & RISCV_IOMMU_DC_TC_V;
+ tc |= new_dc->ta & RISCV_IOMMU_DC_TC_V;
- WRITE_ONCE(dc->fsc, fsc);
- WRITE_ONCE(dc->ta, ta & RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dc->fsc, new_dc->fsc);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dc->ta, new_dc->ta & RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID);
/* Update device context, write TC.V as the last step. */
dma_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(dc->tc, tc);
@@ -1369,20 +1369,20 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_paging_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
struct riscv_iommu_domain *domain = iommu_domain_to_riscv(iommu_domain);
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
- u64 fsc, ta;
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
if (!riscv_iommu_pt_supported(iommu, domain->pgd_mode))
return -ENODEV;
- fsc = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_MODE, domain->pgd_mode) |
- FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_PPN, virt_to_pfn(domain->pgd_root));
- ta = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID, domain->pscid) |
- RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
+ dc.fsc = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_MODE, domain->pgd_mode) |
+ FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_PPN, virt_to_pfn(domain->pgd_root));
+ dc.ta = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID, domain->pscid) |
+ RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
if (riscv_iommu_bond_link(domain, dev))
return -ENOMEM;
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, fsc, ta);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = domain;
@@ -1484,9 +1484,12 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_blocking_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
{
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
+
+ dc.fsc = RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE;
/* Make device context invalid, translation requests will fault w/ #258 */
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE, 0);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = NULL;
@@ -1505,8 +1508,12 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_identity_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
{
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
+
+ dc.fsc = RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE;
+ dc.ta = RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE, RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = NULL;
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-14 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-14 14:21 [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] RISC-V IOMMU HPM and nested IOMMU support Zong Li
2024-06-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] iommu/riscv: add RISC-V IOMMU PMU support Zong Li
2024-06-17 14:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-18 1:14 ` Zong Li
2024-06-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] iommu/riscv: support HPM and interrupt handling Zong Li
2024-12-10 7:54 ` [External] " yunhui cui
2024-12-10 8:48 ` Xu Lu
2024-12-27 8:37 ` Zong Li
2025-09-01 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] RISC-V IOMMU HPM and nested IOMMU support niliqiang
2025-09-02 4:01 ` Zong Li
2024-06-14 14:21 ` Zong Li [this message]
2024-06-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/riscv: add iotlb_sync_map operation support Zong Li
2024-06-15 3:14 ` Baolu Lu
2024-06-17 13:43 ` Zong Li
2024-06-17 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-18 3:01 ` Zong Li
2024-06-18 13:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/riscv: support GSCID and GVMA invalidation command Zong Li
2024-06-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/riscv: support nested iommu for getting iommu hardware information Zong Li
2024-06-19 15:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-21 7:32 ` Zong Li
2024-06-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] iommu/riscv: support nested iommu for creating domains owned by userspace Zong Li
2024-06-19 16:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-28 9:03 ` Zong Li
2024-06-28 22:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-19 16:34 ` Joao Martins
2024-06-21 7:34 ` Zong Li
2024-06-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] iommu/riscv: support nested iommu for flushing cache Zong Li
2024-06-15 3:22 ` Baolu Lu
2024-06-17 2:16 ` Zong Li
2024-06-19 16:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-28 8:19 ` Zong Li
2024-06-28 22:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-06-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] iommu/dma: Support MSIs through nested domains Zong Li
2024-06-14 18:12 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-06-17 2:15 ` Zong Li
2024-06-14 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] iommu:riscv: support nested iommu for get_msi_mapping_domain operation Zong Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240614142156.29420-4-zong.li@sifive.com \
--to=zong.li@sifive.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tjeznach@rivosinc.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).