From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466C6C3DA49 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 09:57:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=l/YwkdzbPgFf4Qua1h2a4KKcIUjxTRkRu3r6fyHzHRo=; b=EbLdfnWK6Zs1ij tKmPsQn6DhGdC3HtbtHM01EZXE94Mt8SVCdQV5VkqJb8Znbs5ue4obzetfYG2sKQ7L80a9log2QFg mViqBujmnVyW6nDOIgJALejHvcbui2MX4Druu8w3vaOzw/StDnCLnVoF4YmLzV2LFCsIMczekWJYf Q5m9Wrol4L/0Lm3dqOO9EUEycEuMxaFT/N2FdkFxbhBgHIeP2Oaa2VigzaxbRAyiiR/CnTc9v426z NcU/a/jMSFfHeyLj0Nb925LYaHhnxwNRS1LysBN+wrLABr+I0QvYokuVOmc7DTtGTPQZhogUedR4n 9smTwOIJhJ6vBgokYEGg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sZp2T-00000008NIX-3LKY; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:57:33 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sZp1x-00000008N4W-3KPc; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:57:03 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Wb1Q24SDxz6K975; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 17:54:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E41C6140A08; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 17:56:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 10:56:54 +0100 Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 10:56:54 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Mike Rapoport CC: , Alexander Gordeev , Andreas Larsson , "Andrew Morton" , Arnd Bergmann , "Borislav Petkov" , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , David Hildenbrand , "David S. Miller" , Davidlohr Bueso , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , Heiko Carstens , Huacai Chen , Ingo Molnar , Jiaxun Yang , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" , Jonathan Corbet , Michael Ellerman , Palmer Dabbelt , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Samuel Holland , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Thomas Gleixner , "Vasily Gorbik" , Will Deacon , Zi Yan , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/26] x86/numa: simplify numa_distance allocation Message-ID: <20240802105654.00004752@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20240801060826.559858-11-rppt@kernel.org> References: <20240801060826.559858-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20240801060826.559858-11-rppt@kernel.org> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.203.177.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.219) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240802_025701_980835_8E9DBBFB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.68 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 09:08:10 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" > > Allocation of numa_distance uses memblock_phys_alloc_range() to limit > allocation to be below the last mapped page. > > But NUMA initializaition runs after the direct map is populated and > there is also code in setup_arch() that adjusts memblock limit to > reflect how much memory is already mapped in the direct map. > > Simplify the allocation of numa_distance and use plain memblock_alloc(). > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) > Tested-by: Zi Yan # for x86_64 and arm64 Seems sensible. FWIW (which might just be me not bothering to read this one again ;) Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv