From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24C05C52D6D for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:13:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=q0h5j3Y+5vqMBbfCBxvp5l16s5wKDM2M2wfnI87ycTA=; b=vVmeJBkoIi6zRM IW7rprk6q+lyeDYRCuPaZF160jx9dhF1RROrzfxqX4A5Hj4GYlEzcH6QiKy7CDaWSSbO8KCF2eNor hpAxpbcXR+QApCdb/ha3EUtNOBx9Lt4FGksxjiIezrBuHCAAY4gsS7SsJhWKOQEd1kRVbCLn7orL+ jlMRJi4ksCzgaq/zJXReLPT4l8X3QljahuEHJWwNWiRLVwXjU3+KP4gqhxFMl4ppeXtB/8P7Zd2fr W6/Rc0hLBlSnWyUvZWpZf/xMQEjRi0bEqgBLWCl2i6pNs2CkWryiJDf8AvYd0iAJZ9uh+SxqdLPti SKl5P5K6gjGWinxPDVNQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sZqDe-00000008eIe-1eLp; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 11:13:10 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sZqD6-00000008e45-2paA; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 11:12:38 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Wb35J7183z6K9Db; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 19:09:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BD1D140A08; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 19:12:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 12:12:33 +0100 Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 12:12:32 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Mike Rapoport CC: , Alexander Gordeev , Andreas Larsson , "Andrew Morton" , Arnd Bergmann , "Borislav Petkov" , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , David Hildenbrand , "David S. Miller" , Davidlohr Bueso , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , Heiko Carstens , Huacai Chen , Ingo Molnar , Jiaxun Yang , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" , Jonathan Corbet , Michael Ellerman , Palmer Dabbelt , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Samuel Holland , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Thomas Gleixner , "Vasily Gorbik" , Will Deacon , Zi Yan , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 22/26] mm: numa_memblks: use memblock_{start,end}_of_DRAM() when sanitizing meminfo Message-ID: <20240802121232.00005b2c@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20240801060826.559858-23-rppt@kernel.org> References: <20240801060826.559858-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20240801060826.559858-23-rppt@kernel.org> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.203.177.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240802_041237_037896_2C5975B8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.43 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 09:08:22 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" > > numa_cleanup_meminfo() moves blocks outside system RAM to > numa_reserved_meminfo and it uses 0 and PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) to determine > the memory boundaries. > > Replace the memory range boundaries with more portable > memblock_start_of_DRAM() and memblock_end_of_DRAM(). > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) > Tested-by: Zi Yan # for x86_64 and arm64 Makes sense Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron > --- > mm/numa_memblks.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c > index e97665a5e8ce..e4358ad92233 100644 > --- a/mm/numa_memblks.c > +++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c > @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end) > */ > int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi) > { > - const u64 low = 0; > - const u64 high = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn); > + const u64 low = memblock_start_of_DRAM(); > + const u64 high = memblock_end_of_DRAM(); > int i, j, k; > > /* first, trim all entries */ _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv