From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56FBFC52D6D for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 14:02:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=oZkHW7Q4w0xd8BOdLXVOMv2SX44YxwKDdKIlR7K7Mrs=; b=FJ5gDYo19gd/rQ jyphwEosF1K+w49zGbKKg8vrP+/1WcRO2W4xE96xpkVlvWbY03OQenqQkd8N1xVTlYi5xvbBeZ7iU qLSHMLaetokytQ1wdaqNkddtHaNIPMG1wmMA45WrbUe/j67YBPvtt9G0XK5xnxCyuvGNK1ryWFHmU QkNTAdO9cwyzm+6AqWQz24GaiMSXxI8BvOEBn3QOk94ttjghWn7C0Wpy/HGqgG885FxiEb0+tMz0c Uz1W8HUzuA6JsmqHWMNh2LBuarPM8HESeg2svKpdOQy7lKEC9PwFa6aDttxf6fJFIhHvdRnqINYb5 +in+3Y03XK3T5dCEJNuA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sZsrM-000000091Ut-4B3m; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 14:02:21 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sZsqr-000000091JJ-1Ujf; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 14:01:50 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Wb6rS3QPSz6K6ln; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 21:59:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 429D2140A86; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 22:01:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 15:01:42 +0100 Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 15:01:41 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Mike Rapoport CC: , Alexander Gordeev , Andreas Larsson , "Andrew Morton" , Arnd Bergmann , "Borislav Petkov" , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , David Hildenbrand , "David S. Miller" , Davidlohr Bueso , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , Heiko Carstens , Huacai Chen , Ingo Molnar , Jiaxun Yang , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" , Jonathan Corbet , Michael Ellerman , Palmer Dabbelt , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Samuel Holland , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Thomas Gleixner , "Vasily Gorbik" , Will Deacon , Zi Yan , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/26] of, numa: return -EINVAL when no numa-node-id is found Message-ID: <20240802150141.00002143@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20240801060826.559858-24-rppt@kernel.org> References: <20240801060826.559858-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20240801060826.559858-24-rppt@kernel.org> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.203.177.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500004.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.9) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240802_070149_571140_5F849EE0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.38 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 09:08:23 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" > > Currently of_numa_parse_memory_nodes() returns 0 if no "memory" node in > device tree contains "numa-node-id" property. This makes of_numa_init() > to return "success" despite no NUMA nodes were actually parsed and set > up. > > arch_numa workarounds this by returning an error if numa_nodes_parsed is > empty. > > numa_memblks however would WARN() in such case and since it will be used > by arch_numa shortly, such warning is not desirable. > > Make sure of_numa_init() returns -EINVAL when no NUMA node information > was found in the device tree. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv