From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355FFD11717 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 07:40:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RSgc1sjSbgbcKbYWrd0KLSa1kCxqH3Wpi8xlQAtDHsg=; b=gVT3FFL4cu2027 XYTf+2Y1X9KakBwY9eQ0/1UtvR3RYfJklRuX/NHNLx7HBVITx3iDJYizymRCYk9E7oOc7la86W2iw Cl3/eDDMqZWajMw+S4Hw8AaBzo+g16UB2SG2HuGxMyvBs422s4KB7WEaYhMjhBlFI2JZB64tDe1fc 2Np9kBMe6JLHUzufCFKOgY54luteau9wf4aN0oRKNqbXwVMYgtHJ9k+Fu4iz+5XONCe+7camE1bTD vMbtbGYNDK4ZyYVy0+dwekJU9E6NICyIyp1yzWF+ZTwS7AmEBDZEixxjkLuw/PVozndw5dRumtOOG gg0DegmmvXhB8zSiIvig==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t4Evp-00000002pXz-05rD; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 07:40:25 +0000 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.13]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t4EvU-00000002pTJ-3Hgs for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 07:40:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729842006; x=1761378006; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=yBbBH9p6aqtBMVil5u+tl7Fqa8eFLhohsl5YWvv6Zaw=; b=V1Vur0jxpDWrCFORtBeNoQB6dKhqU1ftznA/OoA9PTciz0e1eEuBVZVm KSp5htFk97QR604u8RyEooSOSQ9/kk496swPaxkfgAzsWaHwX2oFi0f/L naLM6ksxv0FEdqNvzxm5egqsDm36AJNQsbmVcQO4as9xM9rdcspLkC5kQ 4LFHKz/6CbrNHfIuM+HIEGjdGnIqW9REnXgkncXLDi3AYX0d2P5L/O+Jq 6DCrW68Y4RKHV8Oe2qtX8kYoWEfj95vMSdQvrdm1YeTRhJFWLS69L7xD1 lvGcN3NpKoDkWgeYQ4tS6C+bCa4Csd/6zRNmT+IL+B6lbnb2mKrahBg8a A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: K+VJgwgBTLW7hVkXvR0bkw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vby9ON1oRBuquPSgGjFtTg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="40610796" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="40610796" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2024 00:40:01 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +EtDZenqS3uQRCXmiEZu3w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NtENei+HSruYwJ95nzTfEg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,231,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="85632621" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2024 00:39:48 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t4EvB-000Xmi-1n; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 07:39:45 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:38:57 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Puranjay Mohan , Albert Ou , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrew Morton , Andrii Nakryiko , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , "David S. Miller" , Eduard Zingerman , Eric Dumazet , Hao Luo , Helge Deller , Jakub Kicinski , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , KP Singh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Martin KaFai Lau , Mykola Lysenko , Palmer Dabbelt , Paolo Abeni , Paul Walmsley , Puranjay Mohan , Shuah Khan , Song Liu , Stanislav Fomichev Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: bpf_csum_diff: optimize and homogenize for all archs Message-ID: <202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241023153922.86909-3-puranjay@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241023153922.86909-3-puranjay@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241025_004005_375690_57DBBCAA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Puranjay, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Puranjay-Mohan/net-checksum-move-from32to16-to-generic-header/20241023-234347 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023153922.86909-3-puranjay%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: bpf_csum_diff: optimize and homogenize for all archs config: i386-randconfig-061-20241025 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241025/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241025/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@ net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@ net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr @@ got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh @@ net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh net/core/filter.c:10993:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11000:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11004:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11013:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11017:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xdp_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11029:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11035:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11039:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11045:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11049:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11055:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11059:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11066:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11070:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11076:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11079:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11085:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11088:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11094:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11097:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11103:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11106:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11113:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11116:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11123:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11126:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11132:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11460:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11466:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11668:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:11672:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@ net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@ net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@ net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@ net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@ net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@ net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@ net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@ net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@ net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@ net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to >> net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int sum @@ got restricted __wsum @@ net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse: expected unsigned int sum net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse: got restricted __wsum net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int sum @@ got restricted __wsum @@ net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse: expected unsigned int sum net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse: got restricted __wsum net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int sum @@ got restricted __wsum @@ net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse: expected unsigned int sum net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse: got restricted __wsum net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum [usertype] seed @@ net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse: expected unsigned long long net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse: got restricted __wsum [usertype] seed net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum @@ net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse: expected unsigned long long net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum vim +2023 net/core/filter.c 2009 2010 BPF_CALL_5(bpf_csum_diff, __be32 *, from, u32, from_size, 2011 __be32 *, to, u32, to_size, __wsum, seed) 2012 { 2013 /* This is quite flexible, some examples: 2014 * 2015 * from_size == 0, to_size > 0, seed := csum --> pushing data 2016 * from_size > 0, to_size == 0, seed := csum --> pulling data 2017 * from_size > 0, to_size > 0, seed := 0 --> diffing data 2018 * 2019 * Even for diffing, from_size and to_size don't need to be equal. 2020 */ 2021 2022 if (from_size && to_size) > 2023 return csum_from32to16(csum_sub(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed), 2024 csum_partial(from, from_size, 0))); 2025 if (to_size) 2026 return csum_from32to16(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed)); 2027 2028 if (from_size) 2029 return csum_from32to16(~csum_partial(from, from_size, ~seed)); 2030 2031 return seed; 2032 } 2033 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv