From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: Always inline bitops
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:30:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241123-riscv-always-inline-bitops-v1-1-00e8262ab1cf@kernel.org> (raw)
When building allmodconfig + ThinLTO with certain versions of clang,
arch_set_bit() may not be inlined, resulting in a modpost warning:
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: arch_set_bit+0x58 (section: .text.arch_set_bit) -> numa_nodes_parsed (section: .init.data)
acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init() calls arch_set_bit() via __node_set()
with numa_nodes_parsed, which is marked as __initdata. If arch_set_bit()
is not inlined, modpost will flag that it is being called with data that
will be freed after init.
As acpi_numa_rintc_affinity_init() is marked as __init, there is not
actually a functional issue here. However, the bitop functions should be
marked as __always_inline, so that they work consistently for init and
non-init code, which the comment in include/linux/nodemask.h alludes to.
This matches s390 and x86's implementations.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
index fae152ea0508d2e1ea490fffd645eab99cf387bf..c6bd3d8354a96b4e7bbef0e98a201da412301b57 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static __always_inline int variable_fls(unsigned int x)
*
* This operation may be reordered on other architectures than x86.
*/
-static inline int arch_test_and_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
+static __always_inline int arch_test_and_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
return __test_and_op_bit(or, __NOP, nr, addr);
}
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static inline int arch_test_and_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
*
* This operation can be reordered on other architectures other than x86.
*/
-static inline int arch_test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
+static __always_inline int arch_test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
return __test_and_op_bit(and, __NOT, nr, addr);
}
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static inline int arch_test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
* This operation is atomic and cannot be reordered.
* It also implies a memory barrier.
*/
-static inline int arch_test_and_change_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
+static __always_inline int arch_test_and_change_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
return __test_and_op_bit(xor, __NOP, nr, addr);
}
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static inline int arch_test_and_change_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
* Note that @nr may be almost arbitrarily large; this function is not
* restricted to acting on a single-word quantity.
*/
-static inline void arch_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
+static __always_inline void arch_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
__op_bit(or, __NOP, nr, addr);
}
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static inline void arch_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
* on non x86 architectures, so if you are writing portable code,
* make sure not to rely on its reordering guarantees.
*/
-static inline void arch_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
+static __always_inline void arch_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
__op_bit(and, __NOT, nr, addr);
}
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static inline void arch_clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
* Note that @nr may be almost arbitrarily large; this function is not
* restricted to acting on a single-word quantity.
*/
-static inline void arch_change_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
+static __always_inline void arch_change_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
__op_bit(xor, __NOP, nr, addr);
}
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static inline void arch_change_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
* This operation is atomic and provides acquire barrier semantics.
* It can be used to implement bit locks.
*/
-static inline int arch_test_and_set_bit_lock(
+static __always_inline int arch_test_and_set_bit_lock(
unsigned long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
return __test_and_op_bit_ord(or, __NOP, nr, addr, .aq);
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static inline int arch_test_and_set_bit_lock(
*
* This operation is atomic and provides release barrier semantics.
*/
-static inline void arch_clear_bit_unlock(
+static __always_inline void arch_clear_bit_unlock(
unsigned long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
__op_bit_ord(and, __NOT, nr, addr, .rl);
@@ -345,13 +345,13 @@ static inline void arch_clear_bit_unlock(
* non-atomic property here: it's a lot more instructions and we still have to
* provide release semantics anyway.
*/
-static inline void arch___clear_bit_unlock(
+static __always_inline void arch___clear_bit_unlock(
unsigned long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
arch_clear_bit_unlock(nr, addr);
}
-static inline bool arch_xor_unlock_is_negative_byte(unsigned long mask,
+static __always_inline bool arch_xor_unlock_is_negative_byte(unsigned long mask,
volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
unsigned long res;
---
base-commit: 0eb512779d642b21ced83778287a0f7a3ca8f2a1
change-id: 20241123-riscv-always-inline-bitops-0021c4dae36b
Best regards,
--
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-24 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-24 2:30 Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2024-11-27 19:06 ` [PATCH] riscv: Always inline bitops Yury Norov
2025-02-03 19:15 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241123-riscv-always-inline-bitops-v1-1-00e8262ab1cf@kernel.org \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).