From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, conor+dt@kernel.org,
jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: add binding for Microchip IPC mailbox controller
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 08:52:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241204145236.GA202257-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202141107.193809-4-valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 02:11:06PM +0000, Valentina Fernandez wrote:
> Add a dt-binding for the Microchip Inter-Processor Communication (IPC)
> mailbox controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/mailbox/microchip,sbi-ipc.yaml | 117 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/microchip,sbi-ipc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/microchip,sbi-ipc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/microchip,sbi-ipc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e104573d45c1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/microchip,sbi-ipc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mailbox/microchip,sbi-ipc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Microchip Inter-processor communication (IPC) mailbox controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com>
> +
> +description:
> + The Microchip Inter-processor Communication (IPC) facilitates
> + message passing between processors using an interrupt signaling
> + mechanism.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + oneOf:
> + - description:
> + Intended for use by software running in supervisor privileged
> + mode (s-mode). This SBI interface is compatible with the Mi-V
> + Inter-hart Communication (IHC) IP.
> + const: microchip,sbi-ipc
> +
> + - description:
> + Intended for use by the SBI implementation in machine mode
> + (m-mode), this compatible string is for the MIV_IHC Soft-IP.
> + const: microchip,miv-ihc-rtl-v2
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 5
> +
> + interrupt-names:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 5
> + items:
> + enum:
> + - hart-0
> + - hart-1
> + - hart-2
> + - hart-3
> + - hart-4
> + - hart-5
I don't know why Krzysztof said to list them, when all you needed to do
was drop the '+':
pattern: "^hart-[0-5]$"
> +
> + "#mbox-cells":
> + description: >
> + For "microchip,sbi-ipc", the cell represents the global "logical"
> + channel IDs. The meaning of channel IDs are platform firmware dependent.
> +
> + For "microchip,miv-ihc-rtl-v2", the cell represents the physical
> + channel and does not vary based on the platform firmware.
> + const: 1
> +
> + microchip,ihc-chan-disabled-mask:
> + description: >
> + Represents the enable/disable state of the bi-directional IHC
> + channels within the MIV-IHC IP configuration.
> +
> + A bit set to '1' indicates that the corresponding channel is disabled,
> + and any read or write operations to that channel will return zero.
> +
> + A bit set to '0' indicates that the corresponding channel is enabled
> + and will be accessible through its dedicated address range registers.
> +
> + The actual enable/disable state of each channel is determined by the
> + IP block’s configuration.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint16
> + maximum: 0x7fff
> + default: 0
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - interrupts
> + - interrupt-names
> + - "#mbox-cells"
> +
> +allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: microchip,sbi-ipc
> + then:
> + properties:
> + reg: false
How do you address the question about this? Add an explanation in the
schema. No one is going to remember an answer in a review thread. IOW,
assume that we don't remember the answer and will just ask the same
questions again.
You can do something like:
reg:
not:
description: ...
or
reg:
not: {}
description: ...
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 14:11 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add Microchip IPC mailbox Valentina Fernandez
2024-12-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] riscv: sbi: vendorid_list: Add Microchip Technology to the vendor list Valentina Fernandez
2024-12-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] riscv: export __cpuid_to_hartid_map Valentina Fernandez
2024-12-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: add binding for Microchip IPC mailbox controller Valentina Fernandez
2024-12-04 14:52 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2024-12-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: add Microchip IPC support Valentina Fernandez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241204145236.GA202257-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox