From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FDCCC02188 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:17:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=YV7e+jt8lEmLM4erDX27KdqQoR5CFd8Mn37uq3U1Q7I=; b=CYu9bTzBsOKYbJ amzO04pRYBszVzFrgaUElMU5V4dwjWHBCaPjJo5/+v+gzDbv7TdDxKwWkbHEf469oiqgBg36yEwlS fWKwH4N6MJi1p4rQUs+yaF5QWShRSDWe/UG+6tm+O8YJvJ9CZWoLDMsFIAu9EA77BhD8VbGOmjsik VSFEF2SgxgEh8/BWbz8YHOQrrUrNMTSwkh/OBuTcknxy1yzoz/qHcGhkqy7IHHIUbjBCizT+vz4xo K/bLMrREpNN/luMi2CSKonRBIQkXV/JZYEO6cu7ebJWh49dmLu8W4mLeheFfBLHhLUKxL/duuA5pF pOM+PqY9oOo5Jre/AuEA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tcTfv-000000031XM-33J4; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:17:31 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([147.75.193.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tcTfs-000000031Wz-487x for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:17:30 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47177A41969; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4C83C4CED2; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:17:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738001847; bh=bPMgdUx6tBcvM4b3enWsKBCUp6vLClclKDzrrTXyl/w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ddC7HyoAuAE23vOxPA0afI327iU6OWwMgQRKPpr+/BqszfR+Mch+m+c+8DynCieGY 4cR+sjldUqfscWal3R8Twe5t7rdoHvnWbm5Q1/U6CnbHuiYe/6gRuFt8i+Ak4POiUy EHF/MhRhh7C8NJjk15PqjC74lwt4d3Gbh0ZCd5SNF1Rr9NtxDsDPWr9WR4b4Eyx2E/ 4bWYxb0ybR3ulGbihEvATCm4nEFGbiaiwULmzkhxl2Er4SpQcEqxR6tI6tYQEuNshb Y7HNACn49ymJ02zTmo9VCP0334rcKpy2styY3bbuV0HP9Wy/xTVzFQOG8z+KfpQk1I VliHDJwHw1kyA== Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 12:17:26 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: spacemit: add support for K1 SoC Message-ID: <20250127181726.GA538260-robh@kernel.org> References: <20250121-03-k1-gpio-v4-0-4641c95c0194@gentoo.org> <20250121-03-k1-gpio-v4-1-4641c95c0194@gentoo.org> <20250123113042-GYA38135@gentoo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250127_101729_160955_6F63A4D0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 40.52 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Meng Zhang , Yixun Lan , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Yangyu Chen , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Palmer Dabbelt , Jesse Taube , Jisheng Zhang , Paul Walmsley , Inochi Amaoto , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bartosz Golaszewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:19:18PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 11:30:42AM +0000, Yixun Lan wrote: > > Hi Olof: > > thanks for your reivew > > > > On 12:03 Wed 22 Jan , Olof Johansson wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:38:11AM +0800, Yixun Lan wrote: > > > > The GPIO controller of K1 support basic functions as input/output, > > > > all pins can be used as interrupt which route to one IRQ line, > > > > trigger type can be select between rising edge, failing edge, or both. > > > > There are four GPIO ports, each consisting of 32 pins. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan > > > > --- > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/spacemit,k1-gpio.yaml | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/spacemit,k1-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/spacemit,k1-gpio.yaml > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd9459061aecfcba84e6a3c5052fbcddf6c61150 > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/spacemit,k1-gpio.yaml > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > > +--- > > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/spacemit,k1-gpio.yaml# > > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > > + > > > > +title: SpacemiT K1 GPIO controller > > > > + > > > > +maintainers: > > > > + - Yixun Lan > > > > + > > > > +description: > > > > + The controller's registers are organized as sets of eight 32-bit > > > > + registers with each set of port controlling 32 pins. A single > > > > + interrupt line is shared for all of the pins by the controller. > > > > + Each port will be represented as child nodes with the generic > > > > + GPIO-controller properties in this bindings file. > > > > > > There's only one interrupt line for all ports, but you have a binding that > > > duplicates them for every set of ports. That seems overly complicated, > > > doesn't it? They'd all bind the same handler, so there's no benefit in > > > providing the flexibility,. > > > > > yes, all ports share same interrupt line, but each port has its own > > irq related handling register, so it make sense to describe as per gpio irqchip > > > > also see comments below > > > > > > +properties: > > > > + $nodename: > > > > + pattern: "^gpio@[0-9a-f]+$" > > > > + > > > > + compatible: > > > > + const: spacemit,k1-gpio > > > > + > > > > + reg: > > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > > + > > > > + "#address-cells": > > > > + const: 1 > > > > + > > > > + "#size-cells": > > > > + const: 0 > > > > + > > > > +patternProperties: > > > > + "^gpio-port@[0-9a-f]+$": > > > > + type: object > > > > + properties: > > > > + compatible: > > > > + const: spacemit,k1-gpio-port > > > > + > > > > + reg: > > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > > + > > > > + gpio-controller: true > > > > + > > > > + "#gpio-cells": > > > > + const: 2 > > > > + > > > > + gpio-ranges: true > > > > + > > > > + interrupts: > > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > > + > > > > + interrupt-controller: true > > > > + > > > > + "#interrupt-cells": > > > > + const: 2 > > > > + description: > > > > + The first cell is the GPIO number, the second should specify interrupt > > > > + flag. The controller does not support level interrupts, so flags of > > > > + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW should not be used. > > > > + Refer for valid flags. > > > > > > Same here, since there's no real flexibility between the banks, it might > > > make sense to consider a 3-cell GPIO specifier instead, and having > > how to handle the fourth gpio port? I would like to have uniform driver for all ports > > > > > the first cell indicate bank. I could see this argument go in either > > > direction, but I'm not sure I understand why to provide a gpio-controller > > > per bank. > > > > > > > IIUC, your suggestion here was same as the implementation of patch v3 of this driver[1], > > while combining all four ports into one irqchip, which NACKed by maintainer[2]. > > I tend to agree having a gpio-controller per bank provide more flexibility, > > easy to leverage generic gpio framework, even each port can be disabled or enabled, > > and IMO having shared irq handler isn't really a problem.. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241225-03-k1-gpio-v3-0-27bb7b441d62@gentoo.org > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CACRpkdZPD2C2iPwOX_kW1Ug8jVkdHhhc7iFycHtzj5LQ0XWNgQ@mail.gmail.com > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/CACRpkdYgGho=VQabonq4HccEiXBH2qM76K45oDaV1Jyi0xZ-YA@mail.gmail.com > > Hmm, I don't understand the reasoning there, but it's not my subsystem. > > It seems worse to me to misdescribe the hardware as separate blocks > with a device-tree binding that no longer describes the actual hardware, > but it's not up to me. I agree. It's clearly 1 block given the first 3 banks are interleaved. If Linux can't handle 1 node for N gpio_chip's, then that's a Linux problem. Maybe it can, IDK. The lookup from a DT node to gpio_chip just needs to match on more than just DT node pointer, but look at the node ptr and arg cells. Rob _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv