From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/4] entry: Move ret_from_fork() to C and inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode()
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:29:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250320-riscv_optimize_entry-v6-0-63e187e26041@rivosinc.com> (raw)
Similar to commit 221a164035fd ("entry: Move
syscall_enter_from_user_mode() to header file"), move
syscall_exit_to_user_mode() to the header file as well.
Testing was done with the byte-unixbench [1] syscall benchmark (which
calls getpid) and QEMU. On riscv I measured a 7.09246% improvement, on
x86 a 2.98843% improvement, on loongarch a 6.07954% improvement, and on
s390 a 11.1328% improvement.
The Intel bot also reported "kernel test robot noticed a 1.9%
improvement of stress-ng.seek.ops_per_sec" [2]
Since this is on QEMU, I know these numbers are not perfect, but they
show a trend of general improvement across all architectures that use
the generic entry code.
[1] https://github.com/kdlucas/byte-unixbench
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/202502051555.85ae6844-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
---
Changes in v6:
- Update commit message of patch 4 to contain performance numbers
- Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250305-riscv_optimize_entry-v5-0-6507b5dff3ce@rivosinc.com
Changes in v5:
- Rebase on 6.14-rc5
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250127-riscv_optimize_entry-v4-0-868cf7702dc9@rivosinc.com
Changes in v4:
- I had messed up warning for ct_state() on rebase, correct that issue
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250124-riscv_optimize_entry-v3-0-869f36b9e43b@rivosinc.com
Changes in v3:
- Fixup comment to properly reflect args (Alex)
- Fix prototypes for loongarch (Huacai)
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250123-riscv_optimize_entry-v2-0-7c259492d508@rivosinc.com
Changes in v2:
- Fixup compilation issues for loongarch
- Fixup compilation issues with CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_USER
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250122-riscv_optimize_entry-v1-0-4ee95559cfd0@rivosinc.com
---
Charlie Jenkins (4):
riscv: entry: Convert ret_from_fork() to C
riscv: entry: Split ret_from_fork() into user and kernel
LoongArch: entry: Migrate ret_from_fork() to C
entry: Inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode()
arch/loongarch/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 8 +++++
arch/loongarch/kernel/entry.S | 22 ++++++-------
arch/loongarch/kernel/process.c | 33 +++++++++++++++----
arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 2 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 20 +++++++-----
arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 21 +++++++++++--
include/linux/entry-common.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/entry/common.c | 49 +----------------------------
8 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6
change-id: 20240402-riscv_optimize_entry-583843420325
--
- Charlie
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-20 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 17:29 Charlie Jenkins [this message]
2025-03-20 17:29 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] riscv: entry: Convert ret_from_fork() to C Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-20 17:29 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] riscv: entry: Split ret_from_fork() into user and kernel Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-21 6:36 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-03-20 17:29 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] LoongArch: entry: Migrate ret_from_fork() to C Charlie Jenkins
2025-05-05 4:58 ` Huacai Chen
2025-03-20 17:29 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] entry: Inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode() Charlie Jenkins
2025-03-21 21:22 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] entry: Move ret_from_fork() to C and inline syscall_exit_to_user_mode() Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-28 21:54 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-04-29 6:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250320-riscv_optimize_entry-v6-0-63e187e26041@rivosinc.com \
--to=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox