From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3785C54FB3 for ; Thu, 29 May 2025 12:43:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=uHDPo52UcehwLlhOknkfIDCjlvWwwTyhkMPPKXu0Rs0=; b=F013TLoZAA6kFd fRfGY5jbfjBDZNbCM0FAXi6KDgdH8esOHKj9z5ScbAUZywcaQj6ZohCmh7YJENYxDUIT+VHIFFHRe SdZ2ft8VUEXl8767xO5oHGaSag4G2XLI5TJW1XVeVCseL5ijJ4Ywrlj5vyoVM8ycbkPpRAUWTn+28 Q0jIHcCsRpT3LEWna/GmdrYPPq0zKRLrr7qwi8eXuIBUcRi+Gx6dJmWKZl90+OQVVlXaY9n0SHfZF 4x4HrSTrq2y+Czep6TeBtM0kymmikbX215lwc/0VpNLB/XQKUjAPXT1XhMgI6DRI+Conio5lCKofD JIBwXstwBxuEIbhr2Rmw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uKcb0-0000000FkoF-2YUj; Thu, 29 May 2025 12:42:54 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uKbiP-0000000FfiE-2qoK; Thu, 29 May 2025 11:46:31 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4b7PgR28wGz6L4tL; Thu, 29 May 2025 19:45:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF2D9140519; Thu, 29 May 2025 19:46:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Thu, 29 May 2025 13:46:21 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 12:46:20 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Alistair Popple CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] mm: Remove PFN_MAP, PFN_SG_CHAIN and PFN_SG_LAST Message-ID: <20250529124620.00006ac7@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.203.177.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.219) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250529_044629_863971_2FAD02C6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.71 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:32:02 +1000 Alistair Popple wrote: > The PFN_MAP flag is no longer used for anything, so remove it. The > PFN_SG_CHAIN and PFN_SG_LAST flags never appear to have been used so > also remove them. Superficial thing but you seem to be be removing PFN_SPECIAL as well and this description and patche description don't mention that. > > Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig On superficial comment inline. > --- > include/linux/pfn_t.h | 31 +++---------------------------- > mm/memory.c | 2 -- > tools/testing/nvdimm/test/iomap.c | 4 ---- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/pfn_t.h b/include/linux/pfn_t.h > index 2d91482..46afa12 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pfn_t.h > +++ b/include/linux/pfn_t.h > @@ -5,26 +5,13 @@ > diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/iomap.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/iomap.c > index e431372..ddceb04 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/iomap.c > +++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/iomap.c > @@ -137,10 +137,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__wrap_devm_memremap_pages); > > pfn_t __wrap_phys_to_pfn_t(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long flags) > { > - struct nfit_test_resource *nfit_res = get_nfit_res(addr); > - > - if (nfit_res) > - flags &= ~PFN_MAP; > return phys_to_pfn_t(addr, flags); Maybe not the time to point it out, but what is going on with indent here? Looks like some spaces snuck in for that last line. > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__wrap_phys_to_pfn_t); _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv