From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF1D5C83F05 for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2025 04:07:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=JkifwRevZgVlQTqobLetW1N7wrJaMRPRvaQTFkpQPc0=; b=Y/czaeuD3LE/Qf PjT3zlOg/C5FcpPRq1ITm4DceQKi+um3aoe9Ncj+24QVIH4DH/006wLtMtmuIPqn2QamAhzYBbSNQ tsRELyGNXqyYgAGSCiG/De/VrhFJAb+vepnO8tj31QS+wl21uWXenuhPxiI00RPw8a+GYAx8RPymI XEsOoP4jIo3LqsspldZJSnG1FkkB+FMbbxh0csSPfUu3Uxa0O30yd4zGXimtqNLdMvh7KCXUCDK24 gFYiAePb3HJ08douXwgAhBz55vEOW1VOkfBEP/U+DZZsGFaqrkcDGurFpiaZIXIFg9ZERQMw4nDLv IK76N7cMl4RgdNqHCH0g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uYGeb-0000000HKzV-1Ctt; Sun, 06 Jul 2025 04:07:01 +0000 Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183] helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uYGeY-0000000HKz8-1CdI for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 06 Jul 2025 04:06:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [116.232.48.207]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange secp256r1 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dlan) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D67A7341EC0; Sun, 06 Jul 2025 04:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 04:06:46 +0000 From: Yixun Lan To: Philipp Zabel Cc: Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette , Alex Elder , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable tag between SpacemiT's reset and clock trees for v6.17 Message-ID: <20250706040646-GYA408198@gentoo> References: <20250703151823-GYA312602@gentoo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250705_210658_350924_2D9C1184 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Philipp, On 12:02 Fri 04 Jul , Philipp Zabel wrote: > On Do, 2025-07-03 at 15:18 +0000, Yixun Lan wrote: > > Hi Philipp, > > = > > Please pull the following change into the reset tree. This > > allows you to apply the patch 5 of the SpacemiT reset driver [1]. > > = > > Thanks, > > Yixun Lan > > = > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250702113709.291748-6-elder@riscstar.= com [1] > = > Sorry I didn't notice before, this is missing k1-syscon.h from Patch 2. > =A0 no problem > Can we get a clock maintainer ack to place patch 2 in the shared tag as > well? Otherwise you could split patch 2 into soc and clk parts. for the ack, I'd assume Stephen have no objection (Cc him explicitly) technically, there is no problem to place more patches in the shared tag, since the tag will be both sent(by me) to clock and reset tree, so no conflicts in the end. if you expect to at least pass compiling test with patch 5 in reset branch only, then patch 1, 2, 3 should be included, otherwise need to pull clk branch for additional dependency patches. I would propose to have shared tag to include patch 1-4, then you can pick patch 5, in this way, it should both pass all tests (both compile-time and run-time) what do you think? -- = Yixun Lan (dlan) _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv