From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68043CAC598 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:06:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=B3ngvPu5R43GgGAAe8AHn7WsFOs7hwN2PlkscdJv564=; b=CFH0H2/ybkXHhs 0vunOKv8Hee0xgAYcR9EV7ywxzcp9WI3yRNJBiVncTusSlKHcEEYiwUGW3CPeDWGd7uMGdEMGxtxk 9bnKVPSZzS7rV1O47aB65jRZIwx2BNa8WA/x6NBBzh7XWKfj/I0l94uaCGmAkhgX8lLQk8MHtIlU5 dRVNBHZKDfp312nl8nY09JvC+HXo4R/vn1lL59v8d4M9JmZ1FMNxy9YJLbTDGT4CaxMCcb28MMYoP Nh0o8Uz9ULn507Vg9glbi/BYDhEVotNtUzauQ376PcD37apVzspIf6uEjOSC+vjKeWXty3md56N+q AldWHKOR+v1HP+qxwzPA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uyVNi-00000007sCA-0vOD; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:06:02 +0000 Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183] helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uyVNf-00000007sAp-2bmd for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:06:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [180.158.240.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange secp256r1 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dlan) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6061A340E10; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 21:05:53 +0800 From: Yixun Lan To: Lee Jones Cc: Mark Brown , Alex Elder , lgirdwood@gmail.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mat.jonczyk@o2.pl, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, linux.amoon@gmail.com, troymitchell988@gmail.com, guodong@riscstar.com, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v13 0/7] spacemit: introduce P1 PMIC support Message-ID: <20250916130553-GYC1255161@gentoo.org> References: <20250825172057.163883-1-elder@riscstar.com> <175690199980.2656286.5459018179105557107.b4-ty@kernel.org> <7aba368e-709b-49b0-b62c-f2f8250c8628@sirena.org.uk> <20250916084229.GG1637058@google.com> <20250916122724.GB3585920@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250916122724.GB3585920@google.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250916_060559_682264_BD17EB5A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.57 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Mark, Jones, On 13:27 Tue 16 Sep , Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2025, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 09:42:29AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2025, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:36:41AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > > > > > > How should these two patches be merged? Mark has reviewed the > > > > > regulator patch 3 and Alexandre has acked the RTC patch 4. > > > > > > We'd both have been expecting them to go via MFD. > > > > > Why? I don't see any dependencies between them (usually a shared MFD > > > header-file). If there are no deps, it should be taken through its own > > > repo, no? > > > > I used to just apply things but at some point Linus complained about > > cases where the MFD ended up not getting merged (missing the merge > > window or whatever) so I've been treating them like they had an actual > > dependency. > > Not sure I've seen any of that from Linus, but I don't doubt you. The > MFD part has been merged now, so it's save to go ahead and apply the > Regulator part. > Forgive me to chim in.. To be honest, I don't really mind which tree the patch to go through.. But since the patch 3 has no build time dependency on previous two, so it should be fair to take via pmu/regulator tree, I've done a check locally which imply this.. What do you think, Mark? -- Yixun Lan (dlan) _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv