From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B381E6B26B for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 01:31:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=iuuZj57guiWT3pPjsVlFYi1CCVr4pzaK4GMV77/GV6o=; b=1QZrm4MdgHl6Ne 0thg9CI/FGsvmF+dhCWWXqtLgn+zgFRX2lNgTfdna6eU+ygJSiocn/NTCf1CAPuSqqUT4WPaQDeZ0 HKNy/H1rwQ+iaTqdV8BqSYod2gkC+dq/wCDUUdExNHnIxIbTUFbEuoJkfoLlwmt7kcpwFhwAmBNfc yMcrHHQ2O6pCT70UqSb07YxQsl8RLkJSLzBkRfzsKhmSHMMd4gpGC7Ll270RUMckFs0OugCwjVR1E GTMYTvHvi39HUOtocJS5NF6cKhlC7YFJnZ1fMcQxtqG56XXDzdWpNS6hpXCXMAn/Y74v0fuw5MovZ oiMsHjwKQ5hin0WilRtQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vXrEm-0000000EO6w-14bt; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 01:30:56 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vXrEk-0000000EO6a-0VEx for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 01:30:55 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74CF40DD1; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 01:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 613A2C4CEF1; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 01:30:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1766453452; bh=j7q2987NriSlS+UGsGEBmtZisdMET3w6wHahvWlFCXA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dO5p1eAeCiTmrLjfR2upqrJjMfmN+fqYqX5pLP/UpyRrXF2AUHgEYFwEMyD3r1obi pEDjXWgKmiqndnrwphcQ1xmocdXiVenBgaQpH8OhamNZ4Iq/5MM1cZj8puJ14LI3RY LIv+2+3bD4SBxu39wqhdoZkP8nz/qNyqFeQe02gX9CRGPAcZc59Hrq2vgSPjMPIkYw UaOU0CNfN/e1qXIcM9EXSCPrhHOvAC89afJ/neG7VaxyRjcLSVrHRanYLjzuXOsJWy l8K/ZNSDlGs6d4U/rrmNlDoBWYqa9kWYB4qLSlkOXTaf4oEIb8M8vGOL0VKP76nvWM AiNxz4lmAEbWw== From: SeongJae Park To: Andrew Morton Cc: SeongJae Park , "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" , "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" , Sourabh Jain , Borislav Petkov , Christophe Leroy , Heiko Carstens , Ingo Molnar , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Muchun Song , Oscar Salvador , Thomas Gleixner , Vasily Gorbik , linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mm/hugetlb: ignore hugepage kernel args if hugepages are unsupported Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:30:44 -0800 Message-ID: <20251223013045.4579-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20251221104907.032abf56c67f3e50c9c94e31@linux-foundation.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251222_173054_181071_5FB37E6D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.58 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 10:49:07 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 10:22:44 +0100 "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" wrote: > > > > > > > My main concern was - > > > A fixes tag means it might get auto backported to stable kernels too, > > > > Not in the MM world -- IIRC. I think there is the agreement, that we > > decide what should go into stable and what not. > > > > Andrew can correct me if my memory is wrong. > > Yes, -stable maintainers have been asked to only backport patches where > the MM developers asked for that, with cc:stable. There may be > slipups, but as far as I know this is working. > > I don't actually know how they determine which patches need this > special treatment. Pathname? Signed-off-by:akpm? I guess it is pathname, based on ignore_list file [1] of stable-queue repo. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/ignore_list#n16 Thanks, SJ [...] _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv