public inbox for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>
Cc: Feng Jiang <jiangfeng@kylinos.cn>,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr,
	samuel.holland@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: lib: optimize strlen loop efficiency
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:19:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260115111947.54929ed0@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d356705a-843c-06dc-38a3-77eae7d2ef59@kernel.org>

On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 19:03:17 -0700 (MST)
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Dec 2025, Feng Jiang wrote:
> 
> > Optimize the generic strlen implementation by using a pre-decrement
> > pointer. This reduces the loop body from 4 instructions to 3 and
> > eliminates the unconditional jump ('j').
> > 
> > Old loop (4 instructions, 2 branches):
> >   1: lbu t0, 0(t1); beqz t0, 2f; addi t1, t1, 1; j 1b
> > 
> > New loop (3 instructions, 1 branch):
> >   1: addi t1, t1, 1; lbu t0, 0(t1); bnez t0, 1b

Is that a change to the generic C code?
Testing (++sc)[-1] might do the trick without requiring the extra read
of the first location.

> > 
> > This change improves execution efficiency and reduces branch pressure
> > for systems without the Zbb extension.
> 
> Looks reasonable; do you have any benchmarks on hardware that you can 
> share?  Any reason why this patch stands alone and isn't rolled up as part 
> of your "optimize string function" series?

For 64bit you can do a lot better (in C) by loading 64bit words and doing
the correct 'shift and mask' sequence to detect a zero byte.
It usually isn't worth in for 32bit.

Does need to handle a mis-aligned base - eg by masking the bits off
the base pointer and or'ing in non-zero values to the value read from
the base pointer.

	David

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-15 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-18  3:26 [PATCH] riscv: lib: optimize strlen loop efficiency Feng Jiang
2026-01-15  2:03 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-01-15  3:23   ` Feng Jiang
2026-01-24  8:14     ` Paul Walmsley
2026-01-26  3:05       ` Feng Jiang
2026-01-15 11:19   ` David Laight [this message]
2026-01-15 18:46     ` David Laight
2026-01-26  2:52       ` Feng Jiang
2026-01-28 18:59       ` David Laight
2026-01-29  8:34         ` Feng Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260115111947.54929ed0@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=jiangfeng@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox