On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 07:29:52AM +0800, Guodong Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 2:52 AM Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:10:31AM +0800, Guodong Xu wrote: > > > Add description for the Supm extension. Supm indicates support for pointer > > > masking in user mode. Supm is mandatory for RVA23S64. > > > > > > The Supm extension is ratified in commit d70011dde6c2 ("Update to ratified > > > state") of riscv-j-extension. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml > > > index 4ffd61926505..1922dff03787 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml > > > @@ -262,6 +262,23 @@ properties: > > > ratified in RISC-V Profiles Version 1.0, with commit b1d806605f87 > > > ("Updated to ratified state.") > > > > > > + - const: supm > > > + description: | > > > + The standard Supm extension for pointer masking support in user > > > + mode (U-mode) as ratified at commit d70011dde6c2 ("Update to > > > + ratified state") of riscv-j-extension. > > > + > > > + Supm represents a combination of underlying hardware capability > > > + (Smnpm or Ssnpm), U-mode consumer privilege level, and M/S-mode > > > > Should we therefore make this require that Smnpm or Ssnpm are present? > > I'm not sure. Would U-mode DTBs typically omit the privileged extensions like > Smnpm/Ssnpm, making such a dependency impractical? I don't actually know of any u-mode software that uses a devicetree, but my guy feeling is that people won't trim out the lower-priv mode things because they might want/need to know if those features are available on the platform. > > > + software configuration that enables pointer masking for U-mode. > > > + > > > + DO NOT include this property in device trees targeting privileged > > > + system software (S-mode or M-mode). > > > + > > > + This property is only appropriate in device trees provided to > > > + U-mode software where the next-higher-privilege-mode supports > > > + Smnpm or Ssnpm and enables it for U-mode. > > > + > > > - const: svade > > > description: | > > > The standard Svade supervisor-level extension for SW-managed PTE A/D > > > > > > -- > > > 2.43.0 > > >