From: fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com
To: tjeznach@rivosinc.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr,
andrew.jones@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: guoren@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Fangyu Yu <fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] iommu/riscv: support range and non-leaf IOTLB invalidation
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2026 22:42:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260208144213.94856-1-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
From: Fangyu Yu <fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com>
This series adds support for two RISC-V IOMMU v1.0.1 invalidation extensions in
the RISC-V IOMMU driver:
- Address Range Invalidation (capabilities.S), which allows encoding a NAPOT
address range in the IOTINVAL.{VMA,GVMA} ADDR operand when the S bit is set,
reducing the number of invalidation commands for large or superpage-backed
mappings.
- Non-leaf PTE Invalidation (capabilities.NL), which allows IOTINVAL.VMA with
AV=1 and NL=1 to invalidate cached non-leaf PTE information for the given
IOVA, addressing cases where updating mappings replaces a non-leaf entry.
Patch 1 introduces the missing capability/operand definitions and switches the
IOTLB invalidation path to use NAPOT range invalidations when supported.
Patch 2 adds the NL capability/operand definitions and extends the invalidation
path to optionally request non-leaf invalidation. When map_pages() replaces
non-leaf page-table entries, the driver invalidates the affected IOVA range with
non-leaf semantics.
No functional changes are expected on hardware that does not advertise these
capabilities; the driver continues to fall back to the existing invalidation
behavior.
Fangyu Yu (2):
iommu/riscv: Add NAPOT range invalidation support for IOTINVAL
iommu/riscv: Add non-leaf invalidation support
drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu-bits.h | 17 +++++
drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.50.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-08 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-08 14:42 fangyu.yu [this message]
2026-02-08 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/riscv: Add NAPOT range invalidation support for IOTINVAL fangyu.yu
2026-02-08 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/riscv: Add non-leaf invalidation support fangyu.yu
2026-02-10 13:02 ` [PATCH 0/2] iommu/riscv: support range and non-leaf IOTLB invalidation Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-11 12:07 ` fangyu.yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260208144213.94856-1-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andrew.jones@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tjeznach@rivosinc.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox