From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE25F8E4A4 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:29:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NCTJuZ4Fm23DWrdmmvM02WAVfnKqtJOKYaXPVnwdObs=; b=wPFjzBbm42PI1U LcUG2ERSNjpJeT3YcZFyRPomGkYYbU7ZTp2HSQ9pDsNs5VW7KPDirvVKOl6IUSTWfmZtFCUy1wdBF ongjPu58Qg77axIIVou2LgyHqu/fLuQ/Vi6q9+tDShG2Umk7Cswy9lv6++X1kRCmcM1nL4ZvxliwA lq7LIuJ1YB05LUmsil3EKDiO1ysPXaVaev6CanwwvMjnXnchynF0ECI4dKn6NObE/pU1IxRNmuS+C +UFpeazXnuIvAX7Kb1xb/Hjh/xDJmREh4lVFPIm3wVt3RMYYIMlfONh27lJ1J/oFrPMNS4bTlcKuz ZTKtqxWR7r/bKW58CI4Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wDZtV-00000003NMf-29TK; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:29:25 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wDZtU-00000003NMX-2nvU for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:29:25 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4DE6012A; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65D1EC19425; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:29:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776396563; bh=QMIbPVDPg3r2vcf7x8TXu0U64Ddj9Tpjm4r1WvLJOUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=U+cisOJLq4EVy4e9aPrA2hrNaCSo8yN93X1E+jMkUPpmo8yNnNTNQW+eMjnKdTNTi odAd1gL31IJvstLBxC8NpelrX633Um5QuPcyMLgcXPz5CaN+3nq/Kih0UqdydXAJeg Qxr6SOKtNegkXXZmuD0thp7UBK8a+BMcpLA3WQVNmeZ331h8oZpEuAKyzVbVe5j0LQ Skh0qr7qYW2l/wNI5IWpoXf7avrHGSNomiLAxDlCVafVvVyExS/6Lr4Z/dgQBZCVqA 2JGlTTIBHnSEcBwE7nUk+iPle+O23k/F1LGFpOqW5rW5NsU14KT/dfypS/cq4+SdtF 3TvaVi5dH3r5w== Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:29:17 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Yury Norov Cc: Jinjie Ruan , yury.norov@gmail.com, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, arnd@arndb.de, cp0613@linux.alibaba.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arch/riscv: Add bitrev.h file to support rev8 and brev8 Message-ID: <20260417032917.GA4041922@ax162> References: <20260415093827.2776328-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <20260415093827.2776328-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <20260416231441.GA12905@ax162> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 08:34:28PM -0400, Yury Norov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 04:14:41PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > Yury, are you intending to send this series to Linus in the 7.1 merge > > window? > > No, I'm already done with this merge window. This is the material for > the next one, if ever. > > Just as said, I added this one for testing. I am so far have no feedback > from robots. But your report is enough to drop it. The lore.kernel.org link came from KernelCI but it does not look like they do bisecting to identify the commit and notify the authors. It was just sent to the linux-next mailing list. > > If not, it shouldn't be in -next at this point. > > What for do we need -next, if not for early testing? It is just for the two weeks of the merge window to ensure the tree actually stabilizes. This is how it has always been. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/aeDrt2FkMD6ZWaVS@sirena.org.uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/ad9r3jEtJJNv0IiA@sirena.org.uk/ I think Mark meant to say 7.2 but still. Not trying to sound like a cop or anything but the more problems there are in the tree, the harder it is to triage new failures and perform additional testing. Cheers, Nathan _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv