Linux-RISC-V Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao22@gmail.com>
To: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao22@gmail.com>,
	Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm/zsmalloc: reduce lock contention in zs_free()
Date: Fri,  8 May 2026 14:19:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508061910.3882831-1-haowenchao@xiaomi.com> (raw)

Swap freeing can be expensive when unmapping a VMA containing many swap
entries. This has been reported to significantly delay memory reclamation
during Android's low-memory killing, especially when multiple processes
are terminated to free memory, with slot_free() accounting for more than
80% of the total cost of freeing swap entries.

Lock contention in zs_free() is a major contributor to this cost:
  - pool->lock (rwlock) read-side atomic operations become expensive
    under multi-process concurrency due to cacheline bouncing
  - class->lock held across zspage page freeing causes zone->lock
    contention to propagate back

This series addresses both issues:

Patch 1: Encode class_idx in obj value
  On 64-bit systems, OBJ_INDEX_BITS is over-provisioned. We split it
  into class_idx + obj_idx so that zs_free() can determine the correct
  size_class from the obj value alone, without needing pool->lock.

Patch 2: Remove pool->lock from zs_free()
  With class_idx available from the obj encoding, zs_free() acquires
  only class->lock (re-reading obj for a stable PFN). This eliminates
  rwlock read-side contention between concurrent zs_free() calls and
  page migration/compaction.

Patch 3: Drop class->lock before freeing zspage pages
  Move the actual page release (free_zspage) outside class->lock. The
  bookkeeping is done under the lock, but buddy allocator interaction
  (zone->lock) no longer nests inside class->lock.

Performance results:

Test: each process independently mmap 256MB, write data, madvise
MADV_PAGEOUT to swap out via zram (lzo-rle), then concurrent munmap.

Raspberry Pi 4B (4-core ARM64 Cortex-A72):

  mode        Base       Patched     Speedup
  single      59.0ms     56.0ms      1.05x
  multi 2p    94.6ms     66.7ms      1.42x
  multi 4p    202.9ms    110.6ms     1.83x

x86 (20-core Intel i7-12700, 16 concurrent processes):

  mode        Base       Patched     Speedup
  single      11.7ms     9.8ms       1.19x
  multi 2p    24.1ms     17.2ms      1.40x
  multi 4p    63.0ms     45.3ms      1.39x

Single-process shows modest improvement. With multiple processes,
each read_lock/read_unlock atomically modifies the shared rwlock
reader count, and the cost of these atomic operations increases
with more CPUs accessing the same cacheline concurrently.
Eliminating pool->lock removes this overhead entirely.

Patch 1-2 only work on 64-bit systems (gated by ZS_OBJ_CLASS_IDX);
32-bit falls back to the original pool->lock path. Patch 3 benefits
all architectures.

Wenchao Hao (2):
  mm/zsmalloc: encode class index in obj value for lockless class lookup
  mm/zsmalloc: remove pool->lock from zs_free on 64-bit systems

Xueyuan Chen (1):
  mm/zsmalloc: drop class lock before freeing zspage

 mm/zsmalloc.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08  6:19 Wenchao Hao [this message]
2026-05-08  6:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm/zsmalloc: encode class index in obj value for lockless class lookup Wenchao Hao
2026-05-08  6:19 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/zsmalloc: remove pool->lock from zs_free on 64-bit systems Wenchao Hao
2026-05-08  6:19 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm/zsmalloc: drop class lock before freeing zspage Wenchao Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260508061910.3882831-1-haowenchao@xiaomi.com \
    --to=haowenchao22@gmail.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=haowenchao@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox