Linux-RISC-V Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yixun Lan <dlan@kernel.org>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:RISC-V SPACEMIT SoC Support"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:RISC-V SPACEMIT SoC Support"
	<spacemit@lists.linux.dev>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Han Gao <gaohan@iscas.ac.cn>, Ze Huang <huang.ze@linux.dev>,
	Chukun Pan <amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] riscv: dts: spacemit: k1-bananapi-f3: Add vcc5v0_sys regulator for Banana Pi F3
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 06:53:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260511065338-GKA3624147@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANAwSgQNgXKitogbhQFcQaTTFtJ2sfxHehOCPdHH51S0a5wcSg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Anand,

On 20:48 Sat 09 May     , Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Yixun,
> 
> On Sat, 9 May 2026 at 17:48, Yixun Lan <dlan@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Anand,
> >
> > On 13:06 Fri 08 May     , Anand Moon wrote:
> > > Hi Yixun,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your review comments.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 7 May 2026 at 08:15, Yixun Lan <dlan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Anand,
> > > >
> > > > On 10:48 Sat 02 May     , Anand Moon wrote:
> > > > > Define the system 5V fixed regulator (vcc5v0_sys) supplied by the
> > > > > DC input. As per the schematics, vcc5v0_sys is the input power source
> > > > > for the VCC5V0_HUB and 5V_VBUS reglators. Update these regulators
> > > > > to correctly reference vcc5v0_sys as their parent (vin-supply).
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Han Gao <gaohan@iscas.ac.cn>
> > > > > Cc: Ze Huang <huang.ze@linux.dev>
> > > > > Cc: Chukun Pan <amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts
> > > > > index 5790d927b93d..9727ecdd9f6b 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts
> > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts
> > > > > @@ -50,6 +50,16 @@ reg_dc_in: regulator-dc-in-12v {
> > > > >               regulator-always-on;
> > > > >       };
> > > > >
> > > > > +     reg_vcc5v0_sys: regulator-vcc5v0-sys {
> > > > This will fall into the catogery of "non-controllable & serve no devices"
> > > > see similar comment for 'reg_dc_in' which raised by Krzysztof
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/6530526f-59ca-4753-a068-46c62a1a1fed@kernel.org/
> > > >
> > > > or should I ask, what's the real problem if regulator has no vin-supply?
> > >
> > > If the device tree is not configured with the correct power source it
> > > will affect performance.
> > >
> > Please elaborate, or provide enough evidence to prove this, because the
> > conclusion you gave here contradicts with what Krzysztof pointed out
> I don’t have the schematic for that board, so I skipped replying.
> 
No, you didn't answer my question, I was asking why "affect performance",
and you just gave me the opposite conclusion

Let me elaborate, the reg_vcc5v0_sys is a regulator which has no software
or GPIO control, so no need software control from kernel/driver perspective,
which also mean it will be automatically enabled from hardware perspective
once the board power up - "non-controllable" in Krzysztof's reply

the reg_vcc5v0_sys currently only serve as vin for other regulator which
is not a device (e.g not USB, PCIe, eMMC..) - "serve no devices" in
Krzysztof's reply..

and by introducing reg_vcc5v0_sys, kernel driver need to do additional
work to go through probe procedure and register the regulator device,
consumer depend on it need to wait, this will hurt performance, slow
down system boot and even consume more memory..

By dropping reg_vcc5v0_sys, it will result as a stripped power source
tree, this is only downside I can see, but doesn't really hurt..

> Please refer to the POWER TREE diagram, which provides a clear
> visualization of the power sources.
> 
> This board accepts two primary power sources: a 12 V DC input and USB
> Type‑C power.
> From the schematic’s power tree (page 4):
> 
> Type‑C → DC_IN→ SY8386J (Uxxx) → PI PMIC
> 
> According to the block diagram, the SY8386J regulator IC is
> responsible for generating the VCC5V0_SYS rail  VCC4V0_SYS (see page
> 13).
> 
> USBVBUS → SY8386J → VCC5V0_SYS
> USBVBUS → SY8386J → VCC4V0_SYS
> 
> USBVBUS ( TypeC port) --> DC_IN--> 12V
> 
> In this design, the SY8386J operates as a step‑down converter, supplying
> both VCC4V0_SYS and VCC5V0_SYS rails and P! PMIC.
> 
> SY8386 is a high-efficiency synchronous step-down DC/DC regulator
> capable of delivering up to 6A with wide input voltage support and multiple
> protection features.
> Datasheet [1] https://datasheet4u.com/download_new.php?id=1604744
so right, SY8386 is a passive device which need no software control,
non-controllable..

> 
> I have tried to elaborate as clearly as I can.
> >
> > > > Any probe failure or something bad happen? (besides /sys/../regulator_summay)
> > >
> > > Not really; the regulator summary just confirms the PMIC used the
> > > correct power source.
> > > with te device ip blocks.
> > >
> > then I see it's unnecessary to add this
> >
> > > Bananapi F3 schematics.
> > > [1] https://drive.google.com/file/d/19iLJ5xnCB_oK8VeQjkPGjzAn39WYyylv/view
> > > (page 24)
> > >
> > > Please check the shematics VCC5V0_SYS page 4
> > > VCC5V0_SYS->USB_VCC5V0->HDMI_VCC5V0->FAN_VCC5V0->VCC3V3_SYS
> > >
> > > Please check the shematics VCC5V0_SYS page 24
> > > VCC5V0_SYS input for VCC5V0_HUB and 5V_VBUS give the USB hub,
> > > which is enabled by USB3_PWREN (gpio pin)>
> > >
> > > Plese check power tree page 4
> > > USBVBUS->SY8386J UXXX -> PCIE_VCC3V3 for pcie vin source
> > >
> > > So, this series tries to fix the vin source for USB 3.0 and PCIe nodes.
> > >
> > This is not what I ask..
> Opps, I tried, but I wasn’t able to clearly elaborate on how the power sources
> are distributed across the various peripherals.

Hope I make it clear this time..

-- 
Yixun Lan (dlan)

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-02  5:18 [PATCH v2 0/4] spacemit: k1-bananapi-f3: Fix the power source of USB3 nodes Anand Moon
2026-05-02  5:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] riscv: dts: spacemit: k1-bananapi-f3: Add vcc5v0_sys regulator for Banana Pi F3 Anand Moon
2026-05-07  2:45   ` Yixun Lan
2026-05-08  7:36     ` Anand Moon
2026-05-09 12:18       ` Yixun Lan
2026-05-09 15:18         ` Anand Moon
2026-05-11  6:53           ` Yixun Lan [this message]
2026-05-11  9:53             ` Anand Moon
2026-05-02  5:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] riscv: dts: spacemit: k1-bananapi-f3: Update USB regulator on onboard usb and label Anand Moon
2026-05-07  6:40   ` Chukun Pan
2026-05-08  7:36     ` Anand Moon
2026-05-02  5:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] riscv: dts: spacemit: k1-bananapi-f3: Correct USB hub power hierarchy Anand Moon
2026-05-07  6:50   ` Chukun Pan
2026-05-08  7:38     ` Anand Moon
2026-05-07  6:50   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] riscv: dts: spacemit: k1-bananapi-f3: Add vin-supply for PCIe 3.3V regulator Chukun Pan
2026-05-02  5:18 ` Anand Moon
2026-05-08  7:43   ` Anand Moon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260511065338-GKA3624147@kernel.org \
    --to=dlan@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=amadeus@jmu.edu.cn \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gaohan@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=huang.ze@linux.dev \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=spacemit@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox