From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C23FC55182 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:13:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=43RQieCQ/gbbc0EEZRE9rNBVJsRqDBSq1h0EqL0NRWg=; b=YC69oLTlm6SvXg TO/iJIofpl1gU6tkpsbp80KJk6VcuOhXbOoKSQWokPa540eVW10K6AoVC34mMqZ6Z9axPBiMYI/FN FdY7Qoqm73fFoM4CogNB10pGlmLq5tX7Y/rid3AUIgOYxKiFX/n2/WBSeMxg7JRcO9T4PJQItGPCR AM9EbgDLkgbE0lW95hx3yNqiQmEoS70qls1zxLioAGBFcZB1u/B8KzinsS5M4hC6CPILwElPUJ5mL GTB5e9QiCAMhG41aeyiwUZfIsyxb/tYxHXcK/kw1L42biQWwgm9zMR2c6rweYVUoz+zTMtH3cc3QJ 28TxfSRO0S3/cSj9Bhtw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wqtPj-0000000HJJK-2H8D; Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:13:11 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wqtPi-0000000HJIw-1fiR for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:13:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A354960A79; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3744E1F000E9; Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:13:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785766388; bh=ZvuX3gYi0iFYh3K/3zoFONlt8miaxRz0FW6PbvfW+CA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=HNVNklkBqBtRhyKSY3TW0c2Sapiig58cPzEbfBnhyKxG4P10SiQaKB6BBl6NAoxNQ 4Z5dcmbqPljiloJsSoFCXTEqkqmt42ziFjCX92AlLpD/cwQCIjDLrwyCfB8/ci3mEY dV3uDK1opzozzNEO978RkJ+pk2z+h5+U79HnrShlRxrZrxBC1HhQULxMSXrMHXXy7F UuRuy5E73wa+7gU1n0ppdCIRb6kiCe5WSNLwnn4RBbuvRtXYP1/F0LgJ1GAz2cS/S5 77HLDo+sQTXpHug6B1+boWye8T5KubiEaQVPN2UkiW+efTOmTVG7s7WixwPNbA+1C4 OuL8NT6PEeiIg== Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 09:13:07 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Changhuang Liang Cc: Linus Walleij , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Emil Renner Berthing , Paul Walmsley , Albert Ou , Palmer Dabbelt , Alexandre Ghiti , Philipp Zabel , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Lianfeng Ouyang Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/21] dt-bindings: pincfg-node: Add property 'input-debounce-ns' Message-ID: <20260803141307.GA3243695-robh@kernel.org> References: <20260801072711.153217-1-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> <20260801072711.153217-2-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260801072711.153217-2-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Aug 01, 2026 at 12:26:51AM -0700, Changhuang Liang wrote: > Add the property 'input-debounce-ns' to specify debounce time in > nanoseconds as an alternative to the existing 'input-debounce' which > uses microseconds. Make the new property unavailable when the existing > property 'input-debounce' is selected to prevent conflicting definitions. Why do we need this? Why is usec resolution not good enough? That's what your commit msg should answer, not explain the diff which I can read myself. Rob _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv