From: Xiaofeng Yuan <yuanxiaofeng@eswincomputing.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Xiaofeng Yuan <yuanxiaofeng@eswincomputing.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] riscv: kprobes: simulate nop and c.nop instructions
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 20:20:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825122020.1192-1-yuanxiaofeng@eswincomputing.com> (raw)
nop and c.nop have no architectural effect, so handling them through
an out-of-line instruction slot and single-stepping is pure overhead.
This series simulates them directly in the breakpoint handler by
advancing the program counter, following the approach already used on
arm64, and extends the RISC-V kprobes KUnit test to cover both paths.
riscv_probe_decode_insn() is shared by kprobes and uprobes, so the
simulation also applies to uprobes placed on nop instructions. This is
relevant for USDT probe sites in user-space binaries, which are
nop/c.nop instructions on RISC-V, the same use case that motivated the
arm64 implementation. In kernel text, nops are also found at ftrace
mcount call sites and disabled jump_label sites.
Measured on QEMU (RISC-V virt, emulated), this reduces the per-hit
cost of a kprobe on a nop by roughly 40% compared to single-stepping
through the out-of-line slot.
Changes since v1:
- patch 1: add the above use-case justification and benchmark result
to the commit message (per Nam Cao's review).
- patch 2: simplify the test functions to load KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC
directly instead of splitting it into LOWER/UPPER halves (per Nam
Cao's review).
Verified by cross-compiling for RISC-V and running the kprobes KUnit
test in QEMU (ok 1 kprobes_riscv).
Xiaofeng Yuan (2):
riscv: kprobes: simulate nop and c.nop instructions
riscv: kprobes: add nop and c.nop to the KUnit test
arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h | 11 +++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c | 6 +++++
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.c | 14 +++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.h | 2 ++
.../kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
--
2.43.0
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 12:20 Xiaofeng Yuan [this message]
2026-08-25 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: kprobes: simulate nop and c.nop instructions Xiaofeng Yuan
2026-08-26 13:04 ` Nam Cao
2026-08-25 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] riscv: kprobes: add nop and c.nop to the KUnit test Xiaofeng Yuan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825122020.1192-1-yuanxiaofeng@eswincomputing.com \
--to=yuanxiaofeng@eswincomputing.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox