From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [V3] PCI: fu740: Drop to 2.5GT/s to fix initial device probing on some boards
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:49:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2442936e-a53e-59bf-488f-95eac26d1252@ghiti.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220318152430.526320-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Hi Ben,
On 3/18/22 16:24, Ben Dooks wrote:
> The fu740 PCIe core does not probe any devices on the SiFive Unmatched
> board without this fix (or having U-Boot explicitly start the PCIe via
> either boot-script or user command). The fix is to start the link at
> 2.5GT/s speeds and once the link is up then change the maximum speed back
> to the default.
>
> The U-Boot driver claims to set the link-speed to 2.5GT/s to get the probe
> to work (and U-Boot does print link up at 2.5GT/s) in the following code:
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/drivers/pci/pcie_dw_sifive.c?id=v2022.01#L271
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
> --
> Note, this patch has had significant re-work since the previous 4
> sets, including trying to fix style, message, reliance on the U-Boot
> fix and the comments about usage of LINK_CAP and reserved fields.
>
> v2:
> - fix issues with Gen1/2.5GTs
> - updated comment on the initial probe
> - run tests with both uninitialised and initialsed pcie from uboot
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c
> index 842b7202b96e..ecac0364178a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-fu740.c
> @@ -181,10 +181,60 @@ static int fu740_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> {
> struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> struct fu740_pcie *afp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + u8 cap_exp = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> + int ret;
> + u32 orig, tmp;
> +
> + /*
> + * Force 2.5GT/s when starting the link, due to some devices not
> + * probing at higher speeds. This happens with the PCIe switch
> + * on the Unmatched board when U-Boot has not initialised the PCIe.
> + * The fix in U-Boot is to force 2.5GT/s, which then gets cleared
> + * by the soft reset does by this driver.
> + */
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "cap_exp at %x\n", cap_exp);
> + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> +
> + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> + orig = tmp & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> + tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> + tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB;
> + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
>
> /* Enable LTSSM */
> writel_relaxed(0x1, afp->mgmt_base + PCIEX8MGMT_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE);
> - return 0;
> +
> + ret = dw_pcie_wait_for_link(pci);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "error: link did not start\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> + if ((tmp & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS) != orig) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "changing speed back to original\n");
> +
> + tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> + tmp |= orig;
> + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, cap_exp + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
> +
> + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
> + tmp |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
> + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, tmp);
> +
> + ret = dw_pcie_wait_for_link(pci);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "error: link did not start at new speed\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = 0;
> +err:
> + WARN_ON(ret); /* we assume that errors will be very rare */
> + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int fu740_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
+cc Maciej and David as there is this other fix that seems to do the
same but differently, it's been under review for some time now:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220302000043.GA662523@bhelgaas/t/
I fell onto this issue recently, I'll give your patch and the above a
try soon.
Thanks
Alex
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-18 15:24 [V3] PCI: fu740: Drop to 2.5GT/s to fix initial device probing on some boards Ben Dooks
2022-03-18 23:03 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-19 12:40 ` Ben Dooks
2022-03-21 13:49 ` Alexandre Ghiti [this message]
2022-03-23 10:36 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2022-03-23 10:40 ` Ben Dooks
2022-04-14 0:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-04-14 7:11 ` Ben Dooks
2022-05-02 11:46 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-05-29 15:56 ` Ben Dooks
2022-03-21 20:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2442936e-a53e-59bf-488f-95eac26d1252@ghiti.fr \
--to=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=david.abdurachmanov@sifive.com \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox