From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC164C4708E for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:44:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=2v9IpfYY7KDDixqE54by1TnMdLNNZdbsW4rI96F0FkI=; b=2Sy2hZB3j5WTC2 tzf1jq2nqvzRbKEDg7zkO+5xTW6qjDBkfzcDvPfp+Zu2HI7tA7o7hJHvoMPNPRC9Z84wQ173ZCtrG 18Y37k2Z8cWPc7pcNBq0pcpUREx04FOuQutmBg0ewzgNUCeEdD40WS76tCY0pvdClPjyczEmwRZD+ 3tS4wVpvakdduyYWkggPFL6LAPwUZ1vcWHjZLvRqr8kkZkG7SydmlyJX58PNyusn5wW3P8t5wJbHV EDHZhN6Y3+dK8fwwu9IEEk9kVHJKwo4FacskFv20D50cTRXm73pVtCCiVcVujbHwtBSCjhviOUyR6 e3WS6ena6DiT3JFgbh+A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p2waj-0063g9-1c; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 15:44:13 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p2waf-0063c7-Kx for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 15:44:11 +0000 Received: from ip5b412258.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([91.65.34.88] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1p2wae-000435-9a; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 16:44:08 +0100 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Paul Walmsley , Conor Dooley , anup@brainfault.org Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Conor Dooley , Atish Patra , Anup Patel , Palmer Dabbelt Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] Documentation: RISC-V: Mention the UEFI Standards Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 16:44:07 +0100 Message-ID: <3113825.CbtlEUcBR6@diego> In-Reply-To: <20221207020815.16214-4-palmer@rivosinc.com> References: <20221207020815.16214-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> <20221207020815.16214-4-palmer@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221207_074409_715193_B7A56F80 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.35 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2022, 03:08:14 CET schrieb Palmer Dabbelt: > The current patch acceptance policy requires that specifications are > approved by the RISC-V foundation, but we rely on external > specifications as well. This explicitly calls out the UEFI > specifications that we're starting to depend on. > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt > --- > Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > index 16b90a31d267..02e6a48809ef 100644 > --- a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > +++ b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > @@ -20,9 +20,11 @@ Submit Checklist Addendum > ------------------------- > We'll only accept patches for new modules or extensions if the > specifications for those modules or extensions are listed as being > -"Frozen" or "Ratified" by the RISC-V Foundation. (Developers may, of > -course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees that contain code for > -any draft extensions that they wish.) > +unlikely to be incompatibly changed in the future. For > +specifications from the RISC-V foundation this means "Frozen" or > +"Ratified", for the UEFI forum specifications this means a published > +ECR. (Developers may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees > +that contain code for any draft extensions that they wish.) Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv