From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0521AC433F5 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 03:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A209C60F9F for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 03:38:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org A209C60F9F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject: From:To:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=o1HH5gungJrMbaJnamxmitCP7v/sxmMdzJlhb1Z7/sQ=; b=mrmQ3XE1g2u5xZ ZuYOV/fa+O4UX+9+MPKYZmrZCz3vqsC2wtiH/QnK4TZAqyIVbFz02WR5cUNW1Bq7+2gKUky6xE7r7 fuoBkYRXl8IG/VbcpL0SRL9rnZ//HRwV7Ox3Ywr8sT0w1H6U+NILSnbdzl/N0DQTSyGzKZDukM//m 0bqO8xvUil8sZ2mbunm5gJf1P+zhBSN8hpsd02nFHtptHD1bNMX+Zwy22rdoNGNt1tFVSwcdl4i8x Kl1xAK5OvI1Ftpw0msXtp8jNKiVEGgMdBKZB3PtCQRspvUhT/AXP0rGeBjLNIfm04ZFh0ko1LS99j u6wTL0neblpp+QZ6Jk6w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mcJU1-00DuoY-D7; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 03:38:41 +0000 Received: from out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.132]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mcJTy-00Dun9-IC for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 03:38:40 +0000 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R171e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e04357; MF=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=31; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0UsUkvOd_1634528302; Received: from testdeMacBook-Pro.local(mailfrom:yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UsUkvOd_1634528302) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:38:23 +0800 To: Guo Ren , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Josh Poimboeuf , Jiri Kosina , Miroslav Benes , Petr Mladek , Joe Lawrence , Colin Ian King , Masami Hiramatsu , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Nicholas Piggin , Jisheng Zhang , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org From: =?UTF-8?B?546L6LSH?= Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] fix & prevent the missing preemption disabling Message-ID: <32a36348-69ee-6464-390c-3a8d6e9d2b53@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:38:21 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211017_203838_832319_F4E39A50 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.11 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The testing show that perf_ftrace_function_call() are using smp_processor_id() with preemption enabled, all the checking on CPU could be wrong after preemption. As Peter point out, the section between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock/unlock() pair require the preemption to be disabled as 'Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst' explained, but currently the work is done outside of the helpers. And since the internal using of trace_test_and_set_recursion() and trace_clear_recursion() also require preemption to be disabled, we can just merge the logical together. Patch 1/2 will make sure preemption disabled when recursion lock succeed, patch 2/2 will do smp_processor_id() checking after trylock() to address the issue. v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8c7de46d-9869-aa5e-2bb9-5dbc2eda395e@linux.alibaba.com/ v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b1d7fe43-ce84-0ed7-32f7-ea1d12d0b716@linux.alibaba.com/ v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/ Michael Wang (2): ftrace: disable preemption when recursion locked ftrace: do CPU checking after preemption disabled arch/csky/kernel/probes/ftrace.c | 2 -- arch/parisc/kernel/ftrace.c | 2 -- arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c | 2 -- arch/riscv/kernel/probes/ftrace.c | 2 -- arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c | 2 -- include/linux/trace_recursion.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- kernel/livepatch/patch.c | 13 +++++++------ kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 15 +++++---------- kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 6 +++--- kernel/trace/trace_functions.c | 5 ----- 10 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv