From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: atishp@atishpatra.org, anup@brainfault.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
mark.rutland@arm.com, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com,
samuel@sholland.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] riscv_pmu_sbi: add support for PMU variant on T-Head C9xx cores
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 21:53:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3621249.aeNJFYEL58@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mhng-0bf8c154-76ce-4cd3-bfdb-ffd8a4670600@palmer-ri-x1c9>
Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2022, 07:02:59 CEST schrieb Palmer Dabbelt:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:18:39 PDT (-0700), heiko@sntech.de wrote:
> > The PMU on T-Head C9xx cores is quite similar to the SSCOFPMF extension
> > but not completely identical, so this series
>
> The rest of that sentance got dropped, so I put in
>
> The PMU on T-Head C9xx cores is quite similar to the SSCOFPMF extension
> but not completely identical, so this series adds a T-Head PMU errata
> that handlen the differences.
>
> but LMK if you had a better version, it's still early so I don't mind
> swapping it around.
sounds just fine and sorry for not finishing that sentence on my own.
> b4 also got kind of confused here so I had to merge suff manually.
do you still know what b4 complained about?
My patch workflow is pretty basic (git format-patch + separate
git send-email) so I guess it might be interesting what it was
stumbling on.
Thanks
Heiko
> > changes in v6:
> > - follow Anup's suggestion and hook into the (pending) cpuinfo patch [2]
> > instead of modifying the core sbi_get_* functions
> >
> > changes in v5:
> > - add received Reviews
> > - fix sbi caching wrt. negative values (Drew)
> > - add comment about specific c9xx arch- and imp-ids (Conor)
> >
> > changes in v4:
> > - add new patch to cache sbi mvendor, march and mimp-ids (Atish)
> > - errata dependencies in one line (Conor)
> > - make driver detection conditional on CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD_PMU too (Atish)
> >
> > changes in v3:
> > - improve commit message (Atish, Conor)
> > - IS_ENABLED and BIT() in errata probe (Conor)
> >
> > The change depends on my cpufeature/t-head errata probe cleanup series [1].
> >
> >
> > changes in v2:
> > - use alternatives for the CSR access
> > - make the irq num selection a bit nicer
> >
> > There is of course a matching opensbi-part whose most recent implementation
> > can be found on [0].
> >
> >
> > [0] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/opensbi/cover/20221004164227.1381825-1-heiko@sntech.de
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220905111027.2463297-1-heiko@sntech.de/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727043829.151794-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com
> >
> > Heiko Stuebner (2):
> > RISC-V: Cache SBI vendor values
> > drivers/perf: riscv_pmu_sbi: add support for PMU variant on T-Head
> > C9xx cores
> >
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig.erratas | 13 +++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h | 16 ++++++++++++-
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 5 ++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> > drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 6 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-27 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-11 23:18 [PATCH v6 0/2] riscv_pmu_sbi: add support for PMU variant on T-Head C9xx cores Heiko Stuebner
2022-10-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] RISC-V: Cache SBI vendor values Heiko Stuebner
2022-10-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] drivers/perf: riscv_pmu_sbi: add support for PMU variant on T-Head C9xx cores Heiko Stuebner
2022-10-27 5:02 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-27 19:53 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3621249.aeNJFYEL58@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=Conor.Dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox