From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, pjw@kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
alex@ghiti.fr, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, oleg@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
james.clark@linaro.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org,
mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com,
shuah@kernel.org, mpdesouza@suse.com,
oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com, zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com,
jkchen@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] riscv: stacktrace: switch to frame-pointer based unwinder
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 21:09:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bd83dc6-1206-4af2-bfcf-5894b1029907@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <as6SEF4v6wt5GmVD@nb282.user.codasip.com>
On 10/14/26 4:18 AM, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Thus wrote Shuai Xue (xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com):
>
>> From: Wang Han <wanghan@linux.alibaba.com>
>
>> Replace the open-coded frame-pointer walker in arch_stack_walk() with a
>> robust kunwind state machine, modelled on arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
>> and retargeted to the RISC-V {fp, ra} frame record convention. The new
>> walker tracks stack bounds, consumes frame records monotonically,
>> understands the metadata pt_regs records added in the previous frame
>> record metadata patch, and recovers return addresses replaced by
>> function graph tracing and kretprobes.
>
>> This commit introduces arch_stack_walk_reliable() but does not yet
>> select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE; that is done in a follow-up Kconfig
>> patch so this commit can be reviewed and bisected as a pure unwinder
>> replacement. Until that Kconfig change lands, livepatch is not yet
>> enabled and arch_stack_walk_reliable() has no in-tree caller.
>
>> Three related callers are updated to keep the same frame-record
>> assumptions everywhere:
>
>> * Function graph tracing: the old RISC-V unwinder matched function
>> graph return-stack entries by the saved return-address slot. That
>> was consistent with the static mcount path, but not with the dynamic
>> ftrace path where the parent slot is ftrace_regs::ra. Use the
>> architectural frame pointer as the function graph return-address
>> cookie, matching the kunwind walker.
>
>> * Perf callchains: route kernel callchain collection through
>> arch_stack_walk() so perf sees the same frame-pointer unwind
>> behaviour as dump_stack() and the upcoming livepatch path.
>
>> * dump_backtrace() / __get_wchan() / show_stack(): these now go
>> through arch_stack_walk(); the explicit "Call Trace:" header is
>> moved into dump_backtrace() to preserve the original output.
>
>> The non-frame-pointer fallback walker is kept untouched for
>> !CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER builds.
>
>> Assisted-by: Qoder:Qwen-3.8-MAX-Preview
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Han <wanghan@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c | 6 +-
>> arch/riscv/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 2 +-
>> arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c | 561 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 3 files changed, 473 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
>> index be8b685144174..0facd824c911d 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c
>> @@ -245,7 +245,8 @@ void prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long *parent, unsigned long self_addr,
>> */
>> old = *parent;
>
>> - if (!function_graph_enter(old, self_addr, frame_pointer, parent))
>> + if (!function_graph_enter(old, self_addr, frame_pointer,
>> + (void *)frame_pointer))
>> *parent = return_hooker;
>> }
>
>> @@ -267,7 +268,8 @@ void ftrace_graph_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
>> */
>> old = *parent;
>
>> - if (!function_graph_enter_regs(old, ip, frame_pointer, parent, fregs))
>> + if (!function_graph_enter_regs(old, ip, frame_pointer,
>> + (void *)frame_pointer, fregs))
>> *parent = return_hooker;
>> }
>
>
> Are these two changes fixing a bug in the current code (that is independent
> from the rest of this patch)?
>
> Without your changes, function_graph_enter_regs writes a struct ftrace_ret_stack
> with retp == the saved ra.
>
> And the only place where retp is fetched and checked is
>
> function_get_true_parent_ip
> ftrace_graph_ret_addr(..., (uintptr_t *)ftrace_regs_get_stack_pointer(fregs));
>
> The stored retp is checked against the stack pointer.
>
> Your changes store fp instead of ra, this seems the right thing to do. (And
> it's in line with other archs.)
>
> Should those two changes be in a separate patch (that can be backported to
> stable kernels)?
Hi, Martin,
Thanks for the sharp question.
You are right that the stored cookie is broken. What
ftrace_graph_func() passes as retp is &arch_ftrace_regs(fregs)->ra,
i.e. the slot inside the transient ftrace trampoline frame, which is
popped as soon as the callback returns. That has been the case since
35e61e8827ee8 ("riscv: ftrace: Make function graph use ftrace
directly") introduced ftrace_graph_func() in v6.8. (The code was
copied from arm64's ftrace_graph_func(), but arm64 passes
(void *)frame_pointer there - see 41705c4262aac for the current
shape.)
Since distro kernels only ever use the dynamic path, the net effect
is that the shadow stack is never consulted during unwinding:
whenever the function graph tracer is running, dump_stack(), perf
callchains and __get_wchan() report return_to_handler instead of the
real caller.
I will split these two changes into a separate patch and cc stable.
Thanks.
Shuai
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 9:26 [PATCH v6 0/7] riscv: Add reliable stack unwinding for livepatch Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] riscv: stacktrace: Add frame record metadata Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] riscv: stacktrace: disable KASAN and KCOV instrumentation for stacktrace.o Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] riscv: ftrace: always preserve s0 in dynamic ftrace register frame Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] riscv: stacktrace: introduce stack-bound tracking helpers Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] riscv: stacktrace: switch to frame-pointer based unwinder Shuai Xue
2026-10-09 18:59 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-10-10 3:38 ` Shuai Xue
2026-10-13 20:18 ` Martin Kaiser
2026-10-14 13:09 ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] riscv: Kconfig: enable HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE and HAVE_LIVEPATCH Shuai Xue
2026-09-14 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] selftests/livepatch: Add RISC-V syscall wrapper prefix Shuai Xue
2026-09-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] riscv: Add reliable stack unwinding for livepatch Martin Kaiser
2026-10-08 11:42 ` Shuai Xue
2026-10-12 8:44 ` Martin Kaiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3bd83dc6-1206-4af2-bfcf-5894b1029907@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jkchen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpdesouza@suse.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox