Linux-RISC-V Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, xiao.w.wang@intel.com,
	pulehui@huawei.com, Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: separate Zbb optimisations requiring and not requiring toolchain support
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 12:29:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60EFC387-B19B-46A6-AD1B-D6DAC8108836@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240516-speller-target-d453ad060486@wendy>

On May 16, 2024 10:59:44 AM GMT+02:00, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> wrote:
>On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 09:59:44AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 04:27:40PM GMT, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> 
>> So the new hidden config is a shorthand for
>> 
>> #if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) && \
>>     defined(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB) && \
>>     defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)
>> 
>> which is reasonable to add, since that's a mouthful, but I'm not sure the
>> name, RISCV_ISA_ZBB_ALT, does a good job conveying all that.
>> 
>> If we instead just dropped the 'depends on TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB' from
>> config RISCV_ISA_ZBB (keeping the 'depends on RISCV_ALTERNATIVE',
>> since nobody is really complaining about that), then we could change
>> this to
>> 
>> #if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) && defined(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZBB)
>
>Yeah, I think this is a cleaner solution.
>
>> >  	asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[legacy]", "nop", 0,
>> >  				      RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
>> >  			  : : : : legacy);
>> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
>> > index 880606b0469a..3ed810a6123d 100644
>> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
>> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
>> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>> >  #include <asm/barrier.h>
>> >  #include <asm/bitsperlong.h>
>> >  
>> > -#if !defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) || defined(NO_ALTERNATIVE)
>> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB_ALT) || defined(NO_ALTERNATIVE)
>> 
>> nit: It's sufficient to check !defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB), so no need
>> for this change or its #endif comment change below.
>
>Are you sure? I did test leaving this as-was and it broke the build for
>llvm-14.

Oops, sorry. I didn't look at the full context. You were right.

Thanks,
drew

>
>Cheers,
>Conor.


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

      reply	other threads:[~2024-05-16 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-15 15:27 [PATCH v1] RISC-V: separate Zbb optimisations requiring and not requiring toolchain support Conor Dooley
2024-05-16  4:58 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-05-16  6:37   ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-16  7:59 ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-16  8:59   ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-16 10:29     ` Andrew Jones [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60EFC387-B19B-46A6-AD1B-D6DAC8108836@ventanamicro.com \
    --to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
    --cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox