From: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
spacemit@lists.linux.dev, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] rtc: spacemit: default module when MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 is enabled
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 19:46:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ca28183-1687-4ddc-8b3c-5e5be4255561@riscstar.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251230005142d1bfc6f7@mail.local>
On 12/29/25 6:51 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 29/12/2025 12:02:23-0600, Alex Elder wrote:
>> On 12/25/25 10:53 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>> On 25/12/2025 15:46:33+0800, Troy Mitchell wrote:
>>>> The RTC driver defaulted to the same value as MFD_SPACEMIT_P1, which
>>>> caused it to be built-in automatically whenever the PMIC support was
>>>> set to y.
>>>>
>>>> This is not always desirable, as the RTC function is not required on
>>>> all platforms using the SpacemiT P1 PMIC.
>>>
>>> But then, can't people simply change the config? I don't feel like
>>> this is an improvement.
>>
>> It's not an improvement for people who want to use the SpacemiT
>> P1 PMIC, but it's an improvement for all the other RISC-V builds
>> using "defconfig" that would rather have that support be modular
>> to avoid needlessly consuming resources.
>
> But then, wouldn't MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 be simply not set or set to m ? So
> this doesn't have any impact on other RISC-V builds while it makes
> people using the SpacemiT P1 PMIC jump through hoops to be able to use
> the RTC as this is a very uncommon way to set default values.
>
> My point is:
> - other RISC-V platforms would simply not select MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 or
> have MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 set to m
> - having RTC_DRV_SPACEMIT_P1 built-in by default when MFD_SPACEMIT_P1
> is built-in doesn't really hurt any SpacemiT P1 users but would be
> the expectation of those using the RTC.
The "hurt" isn't about P1 users, it's about everyone else.
> - those wanting to optimise because they won't use the RTC, they can
> already simply unselect RTC_DRV_SPACEMIT_P1 or set it to m.
The purpose is to make the driver a module (not built-in)
when "defconfig" is used (without the need for any Kconfig
fragments to unselect things).
In arch/riscv/configs/defconfig, we have this:
CONFIG_ARCH_SPACEMIT=y
In drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig, we have this
(added by patch 2 in this series):
config MFD_SPACEMIT_P1
default m if ARCH_SPACEMIT
So when using defconfig (alone), MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 is set to m,
to benefit non-SpacemiT RISC-V platforms.
This patch is trying to do the same thing for the RTC,
i.e. having RTC_DRV_SPACEMIT_P1 be defined as a module
by default.
I think you understand.
-Alex
>> I haven't done any testing on this but it looks fine to me.
>>
>> Acked-by: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
>>
>> I think it's a small change worth merging. I don't think
>> doing so does any harm. Your call or course, Alexandre.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
>>>> index 50dc779f7f983074df7882200c90f0df21d142f2..53866493e9bbaf35ff0de85cbfe43e8343eadc1e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ config RTC_DRV_SPACEMIT_P1
>>>> tristate "SpacemiT P1 RTC"
>>>> depends on ARCH_SPACEMIT || COMPILE_TEST
>>>> depends on MFD_SPACEMIT_P1
>>>> - default MFD_SPACEMIT_P1
>>>> + default m if MFD_SPACEMIT_P1
>>>> help
>>>> Enable support for the RTC function in the SpacemiT P1 PMIC.
>>>> This driver can also be built as a module, which will be called
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.52.0
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-30 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-25 7:46 [PATCH v4 0/3] spacemit: fix P1 sub-device Kconfig defaults and dependencies Troy Mitchell
2025-12-25 7:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] regulator: spacemit: MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 as dependencies Troy Mitchell
2025-12-25 7:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mfd: simple-mfd-i2c: add default value Troy Mitchell
2026-01-09 16:41 ` (subset) " Lee Jones
2025-12-25 7:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] rtc: spacemit: default module when MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 is enabled Troy Mitchell
2025-12-25 16:53 ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-12-29 18:02 ` Alex Elder
2025-12-30 0:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-12-30 1:46 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2026-01-09 22:36 ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-01-11 19:55 ` Alex Elder
2026-01-12 1:49 ` Troy Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ca28183-1687-4ddc-8b3c-5e5be4255561@riscstar.com \
--to=elder@riscstar.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dlan@gentoo.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spacemit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox