From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B776ED59F5C for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 02:26:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1PRA7u2Mq8Ocyi3XstDTfZ1uxgC8N8MKGegzJv0k/bQ=; b=PbG1dbj6e7JiCE paoAACgm1AyAwwxTacCJO+zC/kcC7WyYaj+YMDgBRzcjn3v8/MpwC8jGdeGspCLPpUBrvYRQfWOXy 4Dl7YOHIje3qpyIeoRMKkstMqphPspFT5TCZ81UNzIVd/rMn53XkMWOAIg3wfvGeyziYuU28N3NbL Wp1M9RTEU60fQ+i3LZbubz+7/QpFc77r9LIgzeWh7cY2/Bbuoh5C/5tfMUlAz/jyi0Zv5pmEsi6SY AqOMbDf3B/GG/u55ckn8X/xMFT9blVz47oSMbT+cZXM7MmC7yGTBKzW+VSD1W6seuJIY5ZA2+ODOE o/BwUpZ+NdEJVGR9MbSg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vUFL1-00000001Ivx-0YGo; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 02:26:27 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vUFKz-00000001Ivb-2884 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 02:26:26 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329FC42A39; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 02:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB322C4CEF1; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 02:26:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765592783; bh=GxZ2vw8FKYPTlfiJQoVsAuSjIXnuG/3EJIeoU+E10uw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RmrF5tPHeByyOtMog27xcrcdFsh18kiULGV816VrJwQFhAKivhf1MRWC+UDv9Y/L5 vnpfglzhUeNPXk+urijXHOrQUFv+BZbiwr4zws2qmPasTnZM03gRX1Eh0CB5ZB7u5/ hEQNcYfTo57CmRHdpW4DnnAgwKk9IgtwzEaAOBiHAPDRuK5nWSGI6EBrpi3SKMhIRI goTpFvY6jg+UTbhdqRlLA9ti58p4EXUAIplwEFZ1TAPNZ8BiAESdRaRdMS+1f6s9oJ xKVGermCeW4p2nz+0WDOtMeUqJaGLa4yF/5D1N2fzcdvspFOUfl15a5Q5IHdN6cRCv KjxaMOtZqnGOw== Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 19:26:16 -0700 (MST) From: Paul Walmsley To: Linus Torvalds cc: Paul Walmsley , sfr@canb.auug.org.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RISC-V updates for the v6.19 merge window (part two) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <736f7ecb-f1fd-5dec-9cb5-88e2d241eda3@kernel.org> References: <98b74397-05bc-dbee-cab4-3f40d643eaac@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251212_182625_567789_918812E3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.35 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 13 Dec 2025, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 at 14:36, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > > Please pull this second and final set of RISC-V patches for the v6.19 > > merge window. The primary addition in this pull request is support for > > CFI in user processes. This series has been around for almost two years. > > It can damn well be around for another release then. > > Because I'm really tired of these late pull requests. That's true in > general, but it's particularly true when I've told people I'm > traveling with a laptop. I was spending extra time the first week of > the merge window to get things out of the way so that I would *not* > have to deal with conflicts etc when on the road. > > I appreciate people who send me a second pull request with *fixes* for > the first one because they are starting to already react to bug > reports. But your whole thing where you think you send me a first pull > request and then a second one late in the merge window with more > development is simply not ok. It won't happen again. Thanks for the feedback. We'll get the CFI series early into linux-next for v6.20. > Either it was ready to go early, or it's not ready to go at all. None > of this "I have more presents for you". > > The merge window is not for late development or for "Let's make extra > work for Linus the last day of the merge window when he's on the road > in a strange time zone" Understood, and sorry for the noise, - Paul _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv