Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] pwm: dt-bindings: Include generic pwm schema

Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-02-15T12:41:40Z

On 15/02/2022 11:49, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:41:06AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:02:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 15/02/2022 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 08:40, Uwe Kleine-König
>>>> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> [dropped Anson Huang and Yash Shah from Cc: which were not reachable for
>>>>> my last mail]
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:21:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>>> 1. Add tags.
>>>>>> 2. Adjust subject (Uwe).
>>>>>
>>>>> However you only took a part of my suggestion ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (15):
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner,sun4i-a10: Include generic pwm schema
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: imx: Include generic pwm schema
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: intel,lgm: Include generic pwm schema
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: iqs620a: Include generic pwm schema
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: mxs: Include generic pwm schema
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Include generic pwm schema
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: sifive: Include generic pwm schema
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: renesas,pwm: Include generic pwm schema
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: toshiba,visconti: Include generic pwm schema
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>>>>>> dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>>>>>
>>>>> ... The actual patch has a space after the comma, I like this variant
>>>>> without comma better as this is a compatible string.
>>>>
>>>> I am confused. My patch does not have comma after space. Your reply
>>>> had such in the subject, but not in the proposed new subject you wrote
>>>> in msg, so I left it as is. Without comma. If you still see comma, it
>>>> is something with your mail client.
>>>>
>>>> See:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214212154.8853-12-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com/T/#u
>>>>
>>>> Also reply from Vijayakannan does not have comma:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214081605.161394-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com/T/#m80af695f2c751341bc971114aefa00ccc929a3ec
>>
>> Strange: I have this mail four times in my mailboxes (via
>> linux-arm-kernel, linux-pwm, kernel@pengutronix.de and directly). In the
>> two latter the Subject line is broken in two:
>
> I was wrong. The ones to kernel@pengutronix.de and the linux-arm-kernel
> one are the ones with the linebreak.
>
> Hmm,
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/717310.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/717304.html
>
> has the linebreaks, too. Still I wonder what is different between
> kernel@pengutronix.de and u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de.

Other threads - not only mine - are also affected:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/714311.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/714316.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/714364.html

Best regards,
Krzysztof